Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Catholic Church opposition to contraception is a barrier to higher living standards in the Philippines

One-fifth of Filipinos live in slum conditions

Philippine President Benigno Aquino faces a huge roadblock in his push to end the poverty weighing on his 106 million people: the Catholic Church.

I was in the predominantly Catholic nation earlier this month when the Vatican named the first non-European as pope in more than 1,200 years. Filipinos rejoiced in the choice of a Latin American pontiff with a passion for helping the poor. One-fifth of Filipinos live in slum conditions even as the economy grows 6.8 per cent a year.

News of Pope Francis' election came just days before Philippine bishops stymied Aquino's bid to curb the overpopulation that perpetuates poverty, pressuring the Supreme Court to reject the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act, which Aquino signed into law in December. The law, blocked repeatedly since 1998, provides free contraceptives to the poor. Its implicit message is that families shouldn't have more children than they can realistically afford.

The Philippines has already waited too long to rein in one of the most obvious impediments to higher living standards. In mid-2012, one in four Filipinos lived on less than US$1.25 a day, and more than 10 per cent of workers have gone abroad for work.

It is no coincidence that the Philippines population growth rate is twice the Asian average.

The church professes to help those most in need and preaches the gospel of protecting society's weakest - poor women and children. How, then, can the bishops who wield such power over Southeast Asia's fifth-biggest economy fight a step that might do much to achieve those goals?

The United Nations is hardly doing the devil's bidding by arguing that less population growth would reduce Philippine poverty.

The nexus of God and prosperity has long fascinated economists. In his seminal 1776 tome The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith explored how religion impacts growth, and vice versa.

In 2009, Robert Barro and Rachel McCleary of Harvard University looked at how religion affects behaviour in the internet age. Their conclusion? Countries in which a belief in hell is strong often grow faster than average.

In the Philippines, though, the church's influence undermines democracy. Recall that in July 2005 the Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines decided whether the nation would experience a coup and whether then president Gloria Arroyo would resign. That made it clear how much leverage ordained officials have over elected ones.

It's beyond irresponsible for church officials to call family planners propagandists who espouse a "culture of death". Condoms and diaphragms aren't the same as abortions. Anyone who argues as much to a nation's people should go to confession.

Maybe the new pope will realise how antiquated beliefs about contraception are at odds with his determination to address poverty and environmental degradation.

Religious leaders in other nations also fall prey to misplaced anger. Take Indonesia, an economy beset by corruption. Rather than demanding that public officials root out fraud, religious leaders opt to keep pop performers such as Lady Gaga out of their arenas. In Malaysia, spiritual leaders seem more obsessed with Beyonce's wardrobe than graft.

If only the bishops in the Philippines focused all this energy on the scourge of rent-seeking.
Aquino, let's remember, hails from one of the nation's most celebrated dynastic families. His mother, Corazon Aquino, held power from 1986 to 1992 after the assassination of her opposition-leader husband. And Aquino knew the seriousness of the fight he was picking, enduring threats of ex-communication from the church and a torrent of criticism.

So why did Aquino choose this battle? Because it's so necessary. His predecessors avoided the confrontation because they knew their presidencies depended on clerical support. After early successes in battling corruption, Aquino took his high approval ratings out for a ride with family-planning legislation - only to be impeded by religious dogma.

If you are a credit analyst at Standard & Poor's or Moody's Investors Service mulling whether to grant the Philippines an investment-grade rating, you have to wonder how this will shake out.

Bishops in the Philippines have every right to guide their flock to a better, more fulfilling life. Thwarting efforts to end poverty isn't the way to do it.

This article first appeared in the South China Morning Post Photo: AFP

1 comment:

  1. The problem Kerry identifies and examines with such concern is huge. And it is exacerbated by a common trait among (especially young) males. Many such have unprotected sex with young women and abandon them when they become pregnant. This leaves the women alone, impoverished and fighting to educate their often multiple offspring. However they can, which leads them into often immoral solutions just to survive wand to educate. These girls are also easy prey to seedy European males seeking a bit of fun.The callous behaviour of these often educated professional and military, is a crime against individual humanity. On the other hand there are success stories among young women able to find (usually) middle aged men seeking loyal, happy marriages.HIV/AIDS is deplored bu otherwise ignored by the Roman Catholic Church in the Philippines.“Protecting groups and individuals at risk is a moral obligation”. Australia High Court Justice Michael Kirby said these words 16 years ago during the 4th International Congress on AIDS in Asia and the Pacific that the Philippines hosted in 1997 when he urged governments to adopt a morally correct way of containing the HIV epidemic.
    The drain on Catholic adherents globally should tell the Church that its outdated, barbaric attitude to Family Planning leads to squalor. Yet the pesos are ground out of an impoverished nation.By celibate, bigoted attitudes among supposedly intelligent men on golden thrones in Rome. St. Peter would be appalled.