Australian
leaders seek Goldilocks solution for ties with Beijing: not so cold as to risk
investment, not so warm as to turn off voters, America
Donald Trump’s appointment of Peter Navarro as his chief trade adviser
signals the growing risk that the incoming US administration is charting a
course toward greater confrontation with Beijing — and that’s adding
further complexity to Australia’s ties with China.
Australian
political leaders find themselves trying to strike a balance between soothing
anxiety at home over China’s spreading influence and recalibrating the
relations with a long-term strategic ally and what has become the nation’s most
important economic partner.
In the
run-up to his November election victory, Trump promised to impose a 45% tariff
on imports from China. While he has backed away from some of his more
controversial campaign pledges, the appointment of University of California, Irvine,
economist Navarro —said to be the chief proponent of those policies — suggests
Trump is more serious about following through on the trade threat.
That
would drive a wedge between US and Australian interests.
“Australia’s
growth since 2008 has come from China,” Bob Carr, former Australian foreign
minister and director of the Australian-China Relations Institute in the
University of Technology, Sydney, wrote in the Guardian. “No OECD economy is
more dependent on China. China takes one-third of Australian exports. Trump’s
plan – effectively, to slice a few percentage points off China’s economic
growth – would likely tip Australia into recession.”
The Lowy
Institute’s annual survey
of Australian public opinion showed that positive sentiment toward the US has
declined, with almost half of respondents saying Canberra should distance
itself from a Trump-led America. When asked which bilateral relationship was
most important to Australia, the response was split evenly between the US and
China.
To be
sure, the geopolitical balance has been shifting for some time. In a major speech in
2011, the then Secretary to the Treasury Martin Parkinson pointed to “a
situation where our major economic partner is not one of our major strategic
partners” and highlighted the need to be “aware of the challenges the
relationship presents for Australia.”
Those
challenges boiled up again in August this year, when the Australian
Broadcasting Corp reported that
China-linked bodies were by far the largest donors to both main political
parties. Between 2013 and 2015, they donated A$5.5 million (US$3.9 million).
Implicitly, these financial gifts spoke of influence and raised concerns about
transparency and the provenance of the funds.
For
example, Hudson Chen Hak Fan, an honorary adviser to the Australia China
Economics Trade and Culture Association gave A$100,000 to the Liberal Party.
Wang Zi Chun donated A$850,000 to the Labor Party, giving an address in
Hebei province that had been used by a state-owned bank, a government
department and a center for retired Communist Party officials.
The
financial influence is also entering areas of Australian education, with some
schools in New South Wales being paid at least A$10,000 a year by the Chinese
government on condition they provide culture and language courses in schools,
some of which have been made compulsory, the Sydney
Morning Herald reported in May.
“The
Communist Party has been systematically attempting to infiltrate Australian
institutions and manipulate them”
Mainstream
Australian newspapers including the Age, Australian Financial Review and Sydney
Morning Herald carry eight-page inserts from the official China Daily.
“The
Communist Party has been systematically attempting to infiltrate Australian
institutions and manipulate them; business, media, academia,” said Paul Monk,
former head China analyst at the Defence Intelligence Organisation and chair of
the inter-agency working groups on Korea and China. “There’s a serious
effort to encourage the teaching of Chinese history, Communist Party
propaganda. That needs to stop.”
Australia
needs to safeguard the relationship with the Chinese government by putting in
place protective, strategic boundaries to help manage governmental influence
and dominance,
“One area
where this has become apparent is in the area of foreign investment, and the
Foreign Investment Review Board has rejected several propositions which is
relatively unusual,” said Monk, who is now a key member of managing
consulting firm van Gelder & Monk.
Australia
in August blocked the sale of Ausgrid,
the country’s biggest energy grid, to two Chinese companies over security
concerns. Earlier this year, it blocked the sale of Kidman &
Co — the world’s biggest cattle farm — to a Chinese investor.
While
Trump’s impact on the Australia-China relationship is yet to be seen,
there is the potential for its to disrupt long-standing alliance frameworks
within NATO, Monk said. Some of the issues now surfacing have arisen due to
diplomatic decisions made by the Obama administration, he said.
“Iran,
Russia and China think ‘this guys a soft touch. If we push him, he’ll go
backwards.’ And by and large, he has.
“Now
Trump comes in saying ‘I’ve got a whole different way of doing things’ — but
what exactly is it? It’s quite conceivable that the next decade could be a wild
ride.”
“If it
was a British company or an American company buying these things no one would
say as much”
Australians
should be careful not to villainize China for following other economically ambitious
countries such as the UK and US, Erin Chew, Convener of the Asian Australian
Alliance, said.
“There’s
a view that Chinese are buying up everything; ‘they’re buying up all our
properties and they’re buying our farming resources,'” she said. “Farming and
agriculture is a big part of Australian history and a lot of Australians still
feel that ownership over it, however, if it was a British company or an
American company buying these things no one would say as much.”
Direct
Chinese investment in Australia last year reached A$2.8 billion, according
to the Australian Bureau of Statistics; US investors bought A$9.7 billion in
assets.
Another
source of tension has come from an influx of wealthier Chinese migrating to
Australia but not adhering to Australian business rules and
regulations, Chew said. This issue typically arises when owners
run their businesses in a way they are most familiar with; adhering to Chinese
practice – which is starkly different from that in Australia.
“In China
[they think] if I have a lot of money and give money to politicians, to various
organizations, I’ll get support and I’ll be treated as important,” Chew said.
In China it’s not seen as unethical to pay a legal bill or to pay travel
expenses, she said.
The
Australian government is in “an interesting position” in terms of how to make
decisions they need to make to sustain the country’s economy, while
avoiding potential backlash about selling off assets.
“At the
end of the day, they still want to win a lot of votes and they want to remain
in government,” Chew said. “They have to be very careful, and also, they have
to appease the US.”
Elizabeth
Beattie
No comments:
Post a Comment