Some of the claims to sovereignty
over the Senkaku/Diaoyu islands don’t hold up well under scrutiny
East Asia this year has been marked
by rising tensions over the Senkaku Islands (known in China as the Diaoyu
Islands). As has been widely reported, China has dispatched government patrol
and surveillance ships to intrude into Japan’s territorial waters off the
islands, which lie in the East China Sea. Meanwhile, Beijing’s rhetoric has
been more heated. In April, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson appeared to
indicate that the Chinese government regarded
the Senkaku Island issue as a core interest for China. This was the
first government use of a term normally reserved for highly sensitive Chinese
political concerns such as Taiwan, Tibet and the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous
Region. And in recent days, China has made the very provocative decision to
establish an air defense zone that encompasses the Senkaku skies.
With concerns rising that the
situation could spiral out of control, it seems worth reviewing the facts regarding
the sovereignty of the Senkaku and the options available for a sensible
resolution to the issue.
Unfounded Assertions
Ever since it incorporated the
Senkaku Islands into Japanese territory through a Cabinet decision in 1895, the
Japanese government has consistently taken the position that the islands are an
integral part of the territory of Japan. This stance accords with both
international law and the historical facts. The Senkaku have consistently been
under Japan’s effective control, except for a period (from 1945 to 1972) when
the islands were placed under the administration of the United States as part
of Okinawa prefecture.
Before 1971, neither China nor Taiwan
made any claims to “territorial sovereignty” over the Senkaku Islands. For 76
years, neither government expressed any objection to Japanese sovereignty over
the islands.
Why the change in position? In the
late 1960s, a UN agency, the Bangkok-based Economic Commission for Asia and the
Far East (ECAFE), surveyed the waters around the Senkaku. The survey suggested
potentially rich deposits of oil beneath the seabed. After the ECAFE released
its findings, in 1971, the Republic of China (Taiwan) made its first
territorial claim to the islands. Several months later the People’s Republic of
China followed suit.
So, let’s review the history of the
issue more carefully. For ten years starting 1885, Japan conducted field
surveys on the Senkaku Islands, scrupulously confirming that the islands had
never been inhabited and showed no traces of having been under the control of
China’s Qing Dynasty.
Based on this research, the Japanese
government decided in January 1895 to erect national territorial markers on the
islands, officially incorporating the Senkaku Islands into the territory of
Japan. This administrative action was consistent with international law, namely
the internationally accepted legal theory of terra nullius (land
belonging to no one) concerning the rights of acquisition through occupation.
The Historical Record
As the record shows, Japanese
inhabited the Senkaku from 1895 until immediately before the start of World War
II. Japanese people sometimes lived on the islands to harvest albatross
feathers. During another period, a factory was built to process dried bonito.
The population of one of the islands, Uotsuri, topped 200 at one point. In
1920, residents of Ishigaki Island, which was under the jurisdiction of Okinawa
prefecture, rescued Chinese fishermen caught in a storm in waters near the
Senkaku. The Consul of the Republic of China in Nagasaki sent a signed and
sealed letter of appreciation for the rescue in the area of “the Senkaku
Islands in the Yaeyama District of the Japanese Empire’s Okinawa Prefecture.”
The letter cited the names of the residents of Ishigaki Island, whom the
consul noted “were willing and generous in the rescue operation.”
Just over three years after the
People’s Republic of China’s birth, a January 8, 1953 article in the People’s
Daily, an organ of the Communist Party of China had the Senkaku as Japanese
territory. A World Atlas published in China in 1960 showed the
islands as part of Japan. According to notes taken at meetings of the Chinese
government around 1950, copies of which were recently obtained exclusively by
the Jiji Press news agency, Chinese government officials were using
the Japanese name “Senkaku Islands,” indicating that they considered the
Senkaku part of Okinawa prefecture.
When Okinawa prefecture was
provisionally placed under U.S. administration in 1945, the U.S. military used
some of the Senkaku Islands as firing and bombing ranges. With the reversion of
Okinawa to Japanese rule in 1972, the Senkaku returned to Japan, as part of the
prefecture. The U.S. has clearly and repeatedly stated the Senkaku are “within
the range of application” of the Japan-U.S. Security Treaty.
China argues that Japan stole the
Senkaku Islands during the Sino-Japanese war, from August 1894 to April 1895.
The claim suggests Japan “usurped” the islands using the turmoil of war as an
excuse. But in making that assertion, China deliberately ignores two key facts:
(1) Over a period of at least 10 years before the outbreak of the Sino-Japanese
War, the evidence showed that the Senkaku were terra nullius, and not under the
control of China’s Qing Dynasty; and (2) Japan incorporated the islands
into its sovereign territory using procedures in accordance with international
law, prior to the conclusion of the Treaty of Shimonoseki, which ended the Sino-Japanese
War. ‘The Diplomat’
No comments:
Post a Comment