It is imperative we start closely
examining both the radicalising and restraining power of women in
fundamentalist communities. They aren't just sexual accoutrements, they are
strategic assets.
When we
discuss containing and preventing terrorist groups like IS, we usually speak
about restraining men: their passions, their attraction to danger, their ardour
for battle and their fantasies of being rewarded by virgins in heaven. But we
rarely speak about women. Or at least we rarely speak of them in any other
context than as meeting the sexual needs of male jihadis.
This is
despite the fact that women have long played a crucial, if secondary, role in
fundamentalist groups, as recruiters, interpreters, fundraisers and
propagators. A large part of their worth and contribution has of course hinged
on fertility: not just how many children they have, but how many male soldiers
they have brought into the world.
But now
researchers in Indonesia have uncovered a startling new trend: young women want
to become jihadis just like the men.
A study of
women in fundamentalist and jihadi Islamic movements in Indonesia, published by
the Jakarta-based non-governmental organisation Rumah Kita BersamaI, has
uncovered a distinct, and disconcerting generational change. Young women are no
longer content to just play supportive roles in what is known as
"soft" jihadi but want to fight alongside male soldiers, in
"hard" jihadi. As Sasha Havlicek, the chief executive of the
Institute for Strategic Dialogue, says, there is clear evidence of "a
jihadi, girl-power subculture".
The study,
called "Testimony of the Faithful Servants", found that religious
radicalisation means different things for women. They are motivated by group
cohesion and solidarity as well as ideology. For some there are economic
factors such as being allowed to work in small businesses and traditional
medicine. There were also "special intangible benefits for
women:a feeling of peace, blessings in the afterlife, certain knowledge
about life, speaking and writing skills, self confidence and inner
satisfaction". Women are recruited with propaganda about sisterhood,
female friendships and fulfilling a spiritual role.
There are
different kinds of jihad for women in radical groups. Jihad shagir – or small
jihad – involves surrender to one's husband, bearing a bunch of sons who will
fight for Allah, tolerating polygamy and "patiently accept a life of
concern". Young women want jihad kabir - to be recognised as men's equals
on this earth, then go to heaven, perhaps by becoming suicide bombers or
martyrs in battle.
The women
surveyed were not motivated by sexual enticements in the afterlife as men are –
the 72 virgins with big eyes and pert breasts – but they expect to be equally
happy there. One woman said "she would receive a good husband, handsome,
rich, with pleasing breath and with a 'hard-on' whenever the woman wants
it".
The director
of Rumah Kita BersamaI, Lies Marcoes stresses that despite the media's delight
in telling stories of young girls seduced by adventure, the women who join
radical movements, like men, believe in the idea of a caliphate. "These
are not just silly, thoughtless girls. On the contrary, many young women join
these movements because they care deeply about inequality, suffering and
injustice, and are disappointed with the government's inability to eradicate
poverty. Sadly, they have not found a more sensible outlet for channelling
their concerns."
Marcoes, a
women's rights activist and writer, found that while there is no clear
relationship between poverty and militancy, poor women are "the most
resolute and compliant".
You don't
have to spend long in Indonesia's humid, crowded capital, before realising
women have a particular struggle against the growing conservatism here. There
has been a steady creep in the number of provincial regulations governing the
movements of women: making the wearing of the hijab mandatory, forbidding them
from walking at night or riding motorbikes like men (they are only able to ride
side saddle, like Victorian women on horses).
For women
who wrestle with a subordinate position in conservative communities, groups
like ISIS can offer more status and a recognised, rewarded role, especially for
poor women, who have few options to rise.
A recent
study from the University of Zagreb and George C. Marshall European Center for
Security Studies in Germany found several signs that women could take a more
militant role in IS. But there are few signs male leaders will respond to it.
The IS power structure depends on the marginalisation and subjugation of women,
and does not allow them to join combat.
In November
last year, IS published guidelines for women suggested they could support jihad
"by nursing, sewing, or serving through cooking, washing and other
things".
In other
words, while female suicide bombers might be tolerated in the middle east,
female fighters would not be for fear it would lead to their
empowerment and the general emboldening of the women in their midst. This
leads to a crucial and sobering finding: radicalised women are then more likely
to commit violent acts in the west, than the middle east, especially those who
are prevented from travelling, or who have returned from Syria or Iraq widowed,
angry and vengeful. (Upwards of 550 women from the west have gone to fight
with IS in Syria and Iraq.)
We would be foolish
to ignore the restlessness of women from the west who want to fight the west.
And it is imperative we start closely examining both the radicalising and
restraining power of women in fundamentalist communities. They aren't just
sexual accoutrements, they are strategic assets. And they want to do more.
Julia Baird is the host of the ABC's
The Drum. Illustration:
Simon Bosch
No comments:
Post a Comment