In the lead up to state elections, old masters still rule from the
shadows and stand to gain the most from the vote.
Last
week, Adenan Satem, the chief minister of Sarawak, announced that his
right-wing Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu (the United Traditional Bumiputera
Party, or PBB) will contest 40 of the 82 constituencies in upcoming state
elections. The casual remark to the press was no accident and was highly
significant for several reasons.
Adenan is
signalling that the state elections will most probably be held in March or
April this year. More significantly, by telling the world the number of PBB
candidates, he is signalling that politics in Sarawak has not changed since he
took over in February 2014. PBB has dominated Sarawak politics since 1970, and
nothing has changed since Adenan’s much-hyped takeover in early 2014.
In every
state elections since the 1990s, PBB has contested just below 50 per cent of
seats. In both the 2006 and 2011 state elections, PBB contested (and won) 35 of
71 seats in the Sarawak Dewan Undangan Negri (DUN or State
Assembly). The implications are clear – PBB can rule on its own at any
time, but does not grab more than 50 per cent of the seats to show its
commitment to the multiracial, four-party Sarawak Barisan Nasional. In fact, it
is widely known that some of the winning candidates in the other Sarawak BN
parties are “on loan” from PBB or closet PBB members. Thus covertly, PBB
controls more than half the seats in the DUN.
Some
context is necessary here.
When
Adenan took over two years ago, there were expectations that he would reverse
some of the excesses involving Taib Mahmud, his predecessor. Taib’s widely-reported kleptocracy was reaching a
point where even Putrajaya was embarrassed by the constant news reports of his
wealth overseas. In Malaysia alone, Taib and his family allegedly
owned more than 400 companies, while his holding overseas was
conservatively estimated to be around US $15
billion. One website, Sarawak Report, and an NGO, the Bruno
Manser Fund, were largely responsible for exposing the extent of his hidden
wealth overseas.
Despite
all the evidence, Taib was untouchable for a very simple reason. Najib Razak,
Malaysia’s prime minister, needed him to stay in power after the 2013 General
Elections. Razak’s UMNO party won 88 seats while Taib’s Sarawak BN delivered 25
seats. Without Sarawak BN, Najib would be out of power. Taib’s PBB is currently
the second largest party in the federal Barisan Nasional coalition.
One year
later, in February 2014, Taib was sworn in as Sarawak’s Governor and Adenan,
his hand-picked successor, became chief minister. Make no mistake; Adenan was a
pair of ‘safe hands’. He was married previously to Taib’s sister and he went to
school at St Joseph’s in the state capital Kuching with Taib. Adenan even went
to the same university (University of Adelaide) and graduated in the same
degree (law). Adenan later served for more than two decades in Taib’s cabinet.
Like
Taib, Adenan is a master tactician when it comes to Sarawak politics. He
understands that Sarawakians (and Malaysians) have short memories. Rather than
addressing the issue of Taib’s misdeeds, Adenan went for something that all
Sarawakians strongly agree on — Sarawak has gotten a rotten deal in the Malaysian
federation.
For the
past decade, resentment grew among Sarawakians that their state got very little
after helping to establish the Malaysian federation in 1963. The consensus is
that Sarawak does not fit into the UMNO’s model of ‘Malay First, Islam First’
mode of governance and that Sarawak would be much better off had it opted for
independence.
This wave
of Sarawak nationalism could not come at a more opportune time for Adenan, Taib
and Sarawak BN.
Using
Sarawak nationalism gives Adenan two key political advantages. First it gives
him the right to shout “Get non-Sarawak parties out of Sarawak. Sarawak for
Sarawakians” (better known as S4S), knowing full well that the biggest
threat to Sarawak BN are the Democratic Action Party (DAP) and the People’s
Justice Party (PKR).
Although
these two parties are part of their national party, in truth they have a lot of
autonomy when it comes to Sarawak issues. However, many people are excited
about the need to keep Sarawak-based parties in power and to “kick-out Malayan”
parties. At present Adenan’s Sarawak BN component parties are all
Sarawak-based.
Second,
playing the Sarawak nationalism card allows Adenan to deflect all the
unresolved corruption issues related to Taib. Adenan claims that he is in
charge, and that things are changing. But in reality, all Taib-related
companies continue to get government contracts, and all the projects and dams
supported by the Taib administration remain in place.
Adenan
will not, as the locals say, ‘lawan towkay’ (challenge the boss) who in
Sarawak remains Taib.
Taib’s
master political move was to simply shift upstairs to the Governorship and
control the state from the shadows. Sarawakians, especially those in the
rural areas, seem to think that Adenan is really in charge now that his picture
appears daily on the front page of local Sarawak papers.
There is
little doubt that Adenan and Sarawak BN will win big in this year’s vote.
In the last state election, Sarawak BN won 55 of 71 seats. Thirteen of the 16
seats won by the opposition were in urban, largely Chinese-majority
constituencies. A repeat is expected in the 2016 race.
Sarawak
DAP is still the undisputed champion of the urban Chinese, but Adenan’s
personal popularity coupled with the Sarawak nationalism card will mean it will
be tough for Sarawak DAP’s dream of moving into native and semi-urban
constituencies. There is even the possibility that Adenan’s popularity will
lead to reduced majorities for DAP in Chinese seats.
But, the
two big winners for the upcoming polls will be Najib Razak and Taib Mahmud.
Najib can
claim some credit for Sarawak BN’s victory given that he has given leeway for
Adenan to condemn UMNO publicly in Sarawak. Adenan often openly speaks
negatively about UMNO’s race politics in Sarawak and vows not to allow UMNO
into Sarawak. This is wildly popular among the “Sarawak for Sarawakians” crowd.
In fact,
it is so popular that the main NGO behind the S4S campaign was forced to
support Adenan’s call for complete autonomy from Putrajaya, effectively
supporting the Sarawak BN and Taib. A strong showing by Adenan will
reinforce Najib’s claim that he can rely on the “fixed deposit” from East
Malaysia in the next general elections.
The
ultimate winner is Taib Mahmud. Despite all the negative news reports, police
reports, documentaries,
and worldwide campaigns, he is still untouchable and sitting pretty in the
Astana Palace. He is probably more “successful” than either Suharto or Marcos.
The only contemporary leader who comes close to what Taib has “achieved” is Hun
Sen of Cambodia.
Najib’s 1MDB
shenanigans are peanuts compared to Taib and his family’s wealth but
attracts all the attention. Is it any wonder that Taib’s nickname is White
Rajah of Sarawak?
James Chin is Director, Asia Institute,
University of Tasmania
No comments:
Post a Comment