[ABOVE: A cartoon on a
Chinese website depicts corruption as a swarm of flies. The fly
swatter, of course, represents China’s anti-corruption campaign.]
The
following piece, published on Monday this week on the website of the official Party journal Seeking
Truth, arguably speaks to the heart of China’s current political
and ideological ethos. The piece pulls together quite disparate threads — an
article from the Financial Times‘ Beijing
bureau chief Jamil Anderlini, and a report almost a year ago from Bank of America Merrill Lynch
— to paint a stark picture of foreign “hostile forces” colluding with domestic
“agents” to foment a color revolution on Chinese soil.
The Seeking
Truth piece, written by Hou Lihong (侯立虹), identified as a local
government employee from Henan, speaks well enough, and colourfully enough, for
itself. So I’ll avoid the temptation to say more.
Readers
not new to hardline bombast of this kind will recognize the teeth-grinding,
vitriolic tone. Hou writes at one point of “evil collusion between [overseas]
master and [domestic] servant, and of “hostile forces working within China.”
Voices like Anderlini and Bank of America Merrill Lynch are “flies flicking
against the wall, droning on and on.”
Please
enjoy.
The
extraordinary measures employed in China’s anti-corruption drive, and the
brilliant achievements it has so far made, have already astonished the entire
world, becoming a focus of international media coverage. For example, the Times
of India, Singapore’s Lianhe Zaobao and Hong Kong’s South China
Morning Post, . . . have all done positive coverage of the campaign against
corruption in China’s government and military . . . Even certain [media in]
some countries in Europe and America, like United Press International’s
web-based report called, “Internet Users Help Expose Corruption,” and “Life and Death Struggle” in Britain’s Economist,
have reported on the actions and attitudes of China’s leaders toward corruption
. . .
Yet still
certain Western countries and media, for whatever reason, with whatever goals,
voice concern over China’s anti-corruption [campaign], and moreover take a
hostile attitude, even conjuring things out of thin air, making conjectures,
dragging the name of China’s anti-corruption effort through the dirt. This is
outrageous. In its 2013 Human Rights Report, the United States, while giving a
nod to China’s achievements in punishing corrupt officials, made groundless
accusations about the selectivity of the anti-corruption drive, casting doubt
on our Party’s internal discipline procedures. As I understand it, the United
States has always prioritized its human rights reports, wielding them as clubs
with which to beat other countries. For it to play the part of backseat driver
in this way, in such an important government document, clearly violates the
convention in diplomatic relations of not interfering in the internal affairs
of other countries.
Even more
cause for thought is the fact that this country’s Bank of America Merrill Lynch
stated strongly that the anti-corruption drive had borne an economic cost
running into hundreds of millions of US dollars, “perhaps equivalent to the
entire economy of Bangladesh.” And with malice it said that “even clean and uncorrupt
officials don’t dare right now to begin new projects, worrying that this will
be construed as corrupt conduct, and so they simply stash their funds away in
the bank.” Next, it made a great fuss over how “Beijing’s bans on consumption
with public monies and mandated decreases in administrative spending had caused
a dramatic drop in domestic consumer spending.” . . .
The
implication in these statements . . . is that China’s anti-corruption drive has
negative side effects. And if this is still rather obscure, well then,
Britain’s Financial Times is undisguised [in its statements]. An article
in this magazine attributed to [Jamil] Anderlini misrepresents outright, making
crazy and ridiculous claims about China’s top leaders, labeling China’s
anti-corruption campaign “authoritarian anti-corruption” (独裁式反腐), slandering determined anti-corruption as “a [political] movement,” in
“Cultural Revolution style” (文革遗风). . .
Anyone
with a bit of common sense knows that corruption is already a common enemy
around the world. All countries, even those with reputations for clean
governance, have corruption — and all should fight corruption, as successive
world declarations against corruption have fully made clear. What is strange is
that when corruption is raging in China, this draws attack from public opinion
in the West. And now, when China is dealing resolutely with corruption, they
are still spewing calumnies. This exposes their true faces, as determined at
any time to set China up as the enemy.
It goes
without saying that China’s anti-corruption drive is China’s own business, not
something they need to say anything about. And yet these eminent Westerners (洋大人) not only oppose it but maliciously spread rumors with a mind to doing
harm, labeling it in all sorts of [prejudicial] ways. This has reached the
point of madness. Is it possible that China’s anti-corruption drive has set off
their central nervous systems, jabbed at their sore spots, dug their graves?
Clearly, for Western hostile ones (敌对分子) to
oppose China’s anti-corruption campaign so vigorously, to so boldly blacken
China’s leaders, demonstrates that our anti-corruption drive has already logged
achievements that have left our enemies frightened. It demonstrates that
China’s leaders are men of conscience who make our enemies jealous and fearful.
It demonstrates that the anti-corruption momentum in China will root out the
infiltrators hiding in their nests behind the curtain, that it will defeat the
conspiracy by Western countries to change the color of China. So naturally
anti-China forces in the West will stamp in rage.
The faces
of the people of China are wreathed in smiles to look at today’s
anti-corruption drive, and to think back on those years when the anti-China
chorus was so loud. This certainly puts corrupt officials and hostile ones in a
state of constant anxiety . . . so they must, like so many flies flicking
against the wall, drone on and on . . . Like ants shaking the tree, their
calumnies are doomed to fail.
When you
compare the slanderous statements of Western hostile forces about China’s
anti-corruption actions to certain domestic statements inhibiting or opposing
anti-corruption, you can’t help but notice a similar stink about them.
Concerning economic development, for example, there are some in China who say
that anti-corruption has impacted economic development, and overseas there are
others echoing them, saying China’s anti-corruption drive has cost 100 billion
US dollars. Then, for example, you have some people saying domestically that
anti-corruption is about eliminating opposition, and then right away overseas
they slap on the label “authoritarian anti-corruption.” . . .
How, all
in all, are we seeing such things of a similar nature? For this chorus to sing
in such unison, like a seamless heavenly robe — if this is not foreign-domestic
collusion, what then is it? If it is not evil collusion between master and
servant, what then is it? We have always been alert to infiltrants; we have
always been aware of hostile forces working within China to carry out a color
revolution (颜色革命). We never thought these
dangerous elements would be working right at our side, corrupt officials and
“elites” (精英) making trouble. Their
collaboration with forces from the outside demonstrates even more the necessity
of the anti-corruption drive, and demonstrates even more the necessity of
carrying the anti-corruption project to the end.
Western
hostile forces and their domestic agents seek right now to use public opinion
to launch crossfire from the inside and outside, attempting to kill the
anti-corruption drive. In the future, they will employ even more base and
insidious means to attack us. We must remain increasingly alert to this. . . If
only the entire Party and all the people of our country are resolutely united
around the Central Committee with Xi Jinxing as General Secretary, millions
united as one man, can we surely carry the anti-corruption struggle through to
the end, creating a brightness that raises the eyes of the world, and soon
bringing to realization the Chinese dream. By David Bandurski |(The writer’s
office: Science and
Technology Bureau, Xinxiang City, Henan province)
No comments:
Post a Comment