The year 2014 marks 120 years since the First Sino–Japanese War. While
the two nations have enjoyed several decades of peace, there is an uneasy
feeling in China that recent developments and revisions to the Japanese
constitution draw parallels with the decade prior to 1894.
In that year, under the
pretence of defending their consulate and expatriates, the Japanese government
sent troops to the Korean peninsula and invaded China. Four years earlier,
in December 1890, the then Japanese prime minister and ‘father’ of Japanese
militarism, Aritomo Yamagata, made a policy speech claiming that there were two
lines to be guarded if Japan wanted to be capable of self-defence. The first
was the ‘sovereignty line’, which traced the border of Japan’s national
territory. The second was the ‘interest line’, which referred to any area
within which the safety of the sovereignty line was intimately related.
The Korean peninsula was of
course the first to be regarded as part of the ‘interest line’ by Japan.
Yamagata, an aggressive proponent of this expansionist theory, became commander
of the Japanese First Army in 1894, during the administration of Hirobumi Ito.
Under his leadership Japanese troops invaded the Korean peninsula up to
Pyongyang before marching straight on to Liaodong, China. After the annexation
of the Korean peninsula, with the expansion of its so-called sovereignty line,
Japan expanded its ‘interest line’ towards northeast China. By the same logic,
the Japanese military subsequently created the Mukden Incident in 1931 and the
Incident of July 7 in 1937, and launched an all-out invasion in China, leading
to a legacy of war crimes.
Today, nearly 70 years since
the Second World War and the retreat of Japanese imperialism, similarities have
emerged between Sino–Japanese relations now and the relations in the decade
before the outbreak of the First Sino–Japanese War. Despite strong public
opposition in Japan, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has recently made cabinet
resolutions to amend the interpretation of the Japanese constitution to lift
the ban on collective self-defence and proceed with amendments
to the Self-Defense Forces Law. There have also been discussions with the
United States about modifying the Japan–US defence cooperation guidelines and
the division of military responsibilities. All of this indicates that Japan has
abandoned its ‘special defence’ policy and is paving the way for joint
operations with the military forces of the United States and other close
allies.
At this stage the scenarios
set by the Abe Cabinet that would permit use of military force include those
when nations in close relationships with Japan are under attack and those
needed to defend the life and liberty of Japanese people. There is an uneasy
feeling in China that this expansion of Japan’s conception of its self-defence
marks a return to the ‘line of interest’ referred to by Yamagata in 1890. The
mood is that these seemingly unwarranted excuses and vague assumptions are being
made with the Korean peninsula and China in mind.
Japan will not only be
looking to continue strengthening its US alliance but will also include
countries such as the Philippines and Vietnam among those nations with which it
shares a close relationship. These countries have maritime territorial disputes with China, and placing them
in this category would allow Japan to provide them with patrol boats and other
such support.
Furthermore, Japan has been
strengthening its ties with NATO—signing a new accord this year to increase
cooperation. And Abe, on his latest visit to Australia, announced that the two
countries would deepen military cooperation. These seeming attempts to form a
wider strategy to contain China mark the first time Japan has acted in this way
in nearly 70 years since the end of the Second World War.
The Japanese people are
beginning to realise that this revision to the Japanese constitution is a
violation of the conception of peace set down in that document. Rather than
protecting the Japanese people, it is setting up a regional military posture
which risks the lives of Japanese soldiers. It is little wonder then that the
Abe cabinet’s actions will inevitably be strongly opposed by Japan’s
peace-loving people, and cause vigilance and resistance from its Asian
neighbours.
Abe is playing a delicate
game of international diplomacy. While expressing his willingness to meet with
Chinese leaders, Abe is simultaneously launching a diplomatic battle against
China. He has shown no sign of repentance after visiting the Yasukuni Shrine late last year. While claiming that the
door is always open for dialogues, he refuses to hold dialogues with China on
the territorial issue of the Diaoyu/Senkaku islands. Japan appears to be looking forward
to the Sino–Japanese summit in November but in fact refuses any communication
when it comes to the most urgent issues to be addressed, such as the
Diaoyu/Senkaku islands dispute. The Japanese side is fully aware that without
formal lines of communication it will be nearly impossible for the
Sino–Japanese summit to take place.
One important motive for
Japan behaving in this way is to create the impression that it is China that
does not act in accordance with international practice, so enabling it to seize
the higher ground of public opinion. Yet no matter how elaborate Abe’s plan is,
as long as it goes against the current of developing global peace and the will
of the Japanese people, it will eventually fail completely. One hundred and
twenty years since the outbreak of the First Sino–Japanese War, relations
between the two countries are as troubling as ever.
Liu Jiangyong is a Professor
and Associate Dean at the Institute of Modern International Relations at
Tsinghua University.
No comments:
Post a Comment