Newest plans greeted with cautious optimism
Thirteen
years after the Bush Administration promised Taiwan eight diesel-electric
submarines, and 11 years after the Taiwanese walked away from an opportunity to
obtain used but top-notch Italian boats, cautious optimism is emerging that the
island’s navy will in the coming decade command a submarine fleet that can
deter both Chinese aggression and Vietnam from coming too close for comfort in
the Taiwan-controlled parts of the South China Sea.
Military
officials here recently said Taiwan will build its four of its own 1,500-tonne
displacement diesel-electric attack submarines by 2025, with a budget of about
NT$150 billion (US$4.9 billion). The design blueprint is expected to be
completed by year’s end. Thus Taiwan appears eager to join the littoral nations
of the South China Sea in an undersea competition for primacy. Malaysia has
bought French subs, Indonesia subs from South Korea, Vietnam submarines from
Russia. Defense spending as a whole across the region has skyrocketed as
smaller countries seek to counter the growing hegemonism of China over the sea.
Although the
design and construction of modern submarines counts among the trickiest of
tasks for the defense industry, and countries that build diesel-electric boats
generally do not sell arms to Taiwan, observers with a close eye on Taiwan
military matters told Asia Sentinel that the story does have plausible
elements.
“It doesn’t
sound terribly realistic to have the blueprints ready in two months, but it is
not impossible to come up with the local design of a submarine,” said Siemon
Wezeman, Senior Researcher with the Stockholm International Peace Research
Institute’s Arms and Military Expenditure Program.
“Taiwan has a
well-established and quite high-tech shipbuilding industry, and using
experience of their two Dutch subs acquired in the 1980s they could probably
come up with a design, as the general design of the two subs is still valid and
could just be copied.”
He added that
the US, which in the late 1950s stopped producing diesel-electric boats and now
builds only nuclear ones, could help Taiwan with the design and supply most of
the parts Taiwan doesn’t produce, such as sonar and combat systems; and help
Taiwan with the integration, so that “in the end, after a decade or so, Taiwan
may have new submarines that will probably work quite well.”
US Naval War
College strategy professor James Holmes said it’s possible Taipei could make it
happen “if it settles for something very basic and resists the urge to pile on
every gadget shipwrights can conceive of.”
Recurring
reports that Taiwan wants to build its own subs have emerged ever since it
became doubtful that the sale of eight diesel-electric submarines the Bush
Administration agreed to in April 2001 would materialize. Although Washington
has basically promised them, it hasn’t agreed to any specifics partly because
Taiwan didn’t make up its mind on submarines and the high price of them, and
partly because the US did not have an actual design of conventional subs
available for sale.
Except for
the episode in 2003 when Taiwan turned down Italy’s decommissioned Sauro-Class
boats, ideas to use European subs or designs sold via the US came to nothing,
which is hardly surprising given that the European countries possessing
conventional sub technology as well as Russia and Japan did not choose to
profoundly mess up their lucrative business relations with China.
The solution
that ostensibly suggested itself was that the Taiwanese build their own boats,
so that during the presidency of Chen Shui-bian (2000-2008) talk emerged of the
Diving Dragon, a project that envisioned that Taiwan's China Shipbuilding
Corporation (CSBC) would build boats in Taiwan using technology transfers.
However, neither were the Taiwan Navy or the Ministry of National Defense (MND)
convinced due to the projected high price, likely delays and problems with
quality standards that could potentially result from local construction. The
doubts were based on the inconvenient fact that China Shipbuilding has so far
welded together container and bulk carriers that are basically big steel boxes,
very much unlike modern submarines, which are highly compartmented and require
sophisticated sensors and combat systems. It was also warned that CSBC will
find it difficult to build on someone else’s design while trying to obtain all
the subsystems from the original vendors.
Analysts
believe the Diving Dragon will almost inevitably run into profound difficulties
as soon as CSBC starts altering the original design, or having to find
replacement vendors for subsystems.
Nonetheless,
plans started taking shape shortly after President Ma Ying-jeou in April told
the US’s Center for Strategic and International Studies of a new “consensus in
Taiwan” to build the submarines domestically. In late May, the Navy Command
Headquarters confirmed that the CSBC and the Ship and Ocean Industries Research
and Development Center (SOIC) have been appointed to weld a new section of hull
onto Taiwan’s two 70-year-old Guppy-class subs, a move reportedly meant as a
practice session for Taiwan’s welders. Then officials began talking about the
reverse-engineering of Taiwan’s other two boats, the Dutch-built Sea Dragon and
the Sea Tiger. In mid-November the Sea Dragon successfully tested two
submarine-launched Harpoon missiles Taiwan acquired from the US.
“The Taiwan
Navy and the Ministry of National Defense have been analyzing Taiwan's
potential to build submarines for a very long time and have clearly concluded
that they have the ability to develop and build the ship,” said Rick Fisher,
Senior Fellow, International Assessment and Strategy Center. “The U.S.
Department of Defense is now considering its policy response to Taiwan
submarine program, but there a good chance it will decide to be supportive.”
Fisher added,
however, that the DoD doesn’t make the final decision, the US President does,
“whose key advisors’ views regarding the indigenous Taiwan sub program are not
known.”
The Japan angle?
Meanwhile,
John Pike, director of Globalsecurity.org, a US-based think tank, agreed that
that Taiwan’s “decent shipbuilding industry” could build someone else’s
design.
“They have
been talking about new submarines for a long time, but kept hitting dead ends,”
he said. “The only thing that has changed recently is that Japan is now
exporting weapons, and the Japanese have some jim-dandy submarines.”
Chen Ching
Chang, a political scientist at Japan's Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University,
believes that Japan would consider selling “some of its mothballed subs if
Sino-Japanese relations continued to deteriorate and if the [China-friendly]
Kuomintang lost power to the [Japan-friendly] Democratic Progressive Party in
Taiwan’s 2016 Presidential Elections.”
No comments:
Post a Comment