RESOURCE RACE: Middle powers entangled in Russia and
China's push for regional control
BY an accident of scheduling, I've visited Kiev and Hanoi in the last
couple weeks, and it's been accidentally extremely revealing. Ukraine is a
middle power living next to a giant bear and Vietnam is a middle power living
next to a giant tiger. Ukraine is struggling with how to deal with a declining
Russia that is looking for dignity in all the wrong places -- like in Crimea --
and Vietnam is struggling with how to deal with a rising China that is looking
for oil in all the wrong places -- like in Vietnam's territorial waters.
Russia's attitude towards Ukraine has been: "Marry me, or I'll kill
you." And, China's towards Vietnam has been a variation of that line from
There Will be Blood: "I have a long straw, so I think I'll drink my
milkshake and yours."
Meanwhile, America is trying to figure out how to buttress both Vietnam and
Ukraine in their struggles with their giant neighbours without getting
entangled in either dispute. And, in my jet-lagged torpor, all I've been trying
to do is make sure I don't order Chicken Kiev in Hanoi and Chicken Spring Rolls
in Kiev. Both conflicts tell us a lot about the post-post-Cold War world.
Neither Russia's intervention in Ukraine nor China's in Vietnam's territorial
waters is based on grand ideology or global aspiration. Both are about regional
control, spurred by nationalism and resource competition.
Another similarity is that both Russia and China have not engaged in
traditional cross-border aggression with their neighbours, choosing instead to
operate behind cutouts. Russia used "little green men" in Ukraine --
camouflaged pro-Russia gunmen whose identities are unclear -- and China
deployed a flotilla of 70 civilian vessels and just a few navy ships to the
South China Sea. They towed a giant deep-sea drilling rig 130 nautical miles
off the coast of Vietnam -- well within Vietnam's continental shelf but also in
range of the disputed Paracel Islands that China claims are its own and
therefore entitle Beijing to control a wide arc of surrounding waters.
Vietnamese TV has been airing an animated re-enactment of the
confrontation: when a Vietnamese navy patrol boat challenged a larger Chinese
vessel, it rammed the Vietnamese ship, wounding six sailors. Then, another
Chinese ship used a giant water cannon to shoo away the Vietnamese boats. It's
a huge story here in Hanoi.
In both cases, Russia and China used tactics firm enough to get their way
but calibrated not to galvanise the international community to react much.
China's timing, though, right after President Barack Obama's visit to the
region -- when he criticised China's expansive maritime claims -- seemed to be
a squirt gun in his face.
"It has been a real shock for the whole region," Ha Huy Thong,
the vice-chairman of the foreign affairs committee of the Vietnamese Parliament
told me. "They use civilian vessels and then if you attack them, they say,
'Why did you attack our civilians?'"
But Vietnam has limited options. China "is a rising power. The
question is how can we deal with it?" said Thong.
"It is not only a violation of our territory but of international law.
"We have a saying in Vietnamese," added Thong.
"It's easy to break two chopsticks, but it's very hard to break a
bundle of them."
Until such a coalition gets built, Vietnam -- in an irony of history --
finds itself now looking to America for more protection from its historical
predator, China.
Le Duy Anh, 24, a lecturer at Hanoi's FPT School of Business,
remarked to me when I visited his campus that whenever China does something to
Vietnam these days, people go to the American embassy in Hanoi and demonstrate.
For so many years, Vietnamese fought a war with Americans "trying to get you out", he said, "and now, we are demonstrating to get you to intervene. We don't want bloodshed, so we need someone to tell someone else to calm down".
For so many years, Vietnamese fought a war with Americans "trying to get you out", he said, "and now, we are demonstrating to get you to intervene. We don't want bloodshed, so we need someone to tell someone else to calm down".
So, Americans may think we've lost influence in the world, but, the truth
is, many people out here want our "presence" more than ever. This is
especially true of those living on the borders of Russia and China, who are
each sort of half in and half out of today's globalisation system --
beneficiaries of its trading and investment regimes but revisionists when it
comes to playing by all the rules in their own neighbourhoods. We may not be so
interested in the world, but a lot of the world is still interested in us, and
saying: "Yankee come hither" more than "Yankee go home".
We're not going to go to war on either front. And, Russia and China also
have claims and interests that bear consideration. But if we are to persuade
Moscow and Beijing to resolve these border disputes peacefully, not
unilaterally, we'll clearly need a few more chopsticks in our bundle. Which is
why America's ability to build coalitions is as vital today as the exercise of
its own power. NYT
No comments:
Post a Comment