Indonesia should not cave, must
tell Freeport to sell 51% stake, or else
Hardly any other element exerts the same level of
attraction for mankind than gold. Economist John Maynard Keynes coined the
commodity as a “barbarous relic”, yet people in modern times will still kill
for it.
It is perhaps the interminable
allure of gold that has once again placed gold and copper producer PT Freeport
Indonesia, a unit of politically wired United States miner Freeport McMoRan
Inc. (FCX), in a far more superior curve when dealing with Indonesia.
Freeport, Indonesia’s oldest
foreign investor and biggest taxpayer, operates the world’s biggest integrated
gold and copper mine in Indonesia’s most remote and poorest province, Papua,
generating 98 percent of FCX’s consolidated gold sales and 19 percent of the
company’s copper supply worth more than US$2.7 billion in 2015.
Since commencing operations
more than five decades ago, Freeport is synonymous domestically with gold, not
copper, and is usually perceived with suspicions. All affairs related to the
company have always been political, with many Indonesian politicians and
activists referring to it as a symbol of US economic imperialism in Indonesia.
Given the enormity, coupled
with the geopolitical dynamic where several US policymakers have affiliation
with the company, it is hard not to suspect the “Freeport factor” to be at play
nowadays in the government’s upcoming plan to bend the 2009 Mining Law just to
allow the company, and a few others, to continue to elude a ban on raw and
partly processed mineral exports.
Indonesia has been under
global investor scrutiny in the past couple of weeks as they await to see
whether the country is committed to indiscriminately enforcing the rule of law
as it rushes to decide whether to maintain the current relaxation or to fully
enforce the ban, as mandated by the law before the Jan. 11, 2017 deadline.
The law stipulates that
mineral ore miners must complete their smelters by 2014, when the export ban
should have been fully put in place. The smelters are expected to bring in
added value to the end products, as opposed to exporting ore in its raw or
partly processed form.
However, because none of the
proposed smelters had been completed, including one by Freeport, the deadline
was extended to 2017 by president Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono through a government
regulation, allowing Freeport and its fellow US miner Newmont to continue the
exports despite no progress in their smelter constructions.
If President Joko “Jokowi”
Widodo maintains the relaxation, he will draw criticism similar to that raised
in 2014 when Yudhoyono was accused of violating the law because a government
regulation cannot overrule a law.
However, a circulating draft
government regulation has indicated the President may continue with the
relaxation as well as provide many clauses that appear to benefit Freeport more
than others.
For example, according to the
draft regulation, Freeport will not only be able to resume its exports but the
company will be allowed to sell its shares based on a new calculation that will
see the price soaring to a level where domestic buyers cannot afford them.
Perhaps it is a mere
coincidence that the draft was churned out after a letter from US Senator John
McCain to Jokowi on Dec. 23, demanding Indonesia to facilitate Freeport, and
the appointment of US billionaire Carl Icahn in late December as special
adviser on regulatory reform to US president-elect Donald Trump. Icahn is a
major FCX shareholder.
Regulatory privileges for
Freeport are not without precedent. Based on its contract of work (CoW ), the
company was required to sell 51 percent of its shares to local shareholders by
2011.
However, a string of
regulations were issued along the way that eventually allowed Freeport to dodge
the requirement to this date, and almost no officials have made a big deal out
of it. FCX owns 90.64 percent of the company, while merely 9.36 percent is
owned by the Indonesian government.
No one expects Freeport to
cease operations or to pull out from the country, as it is in the best interest
of all to see the company remain profitable and employ many Papuans.
However, the fairness
surrounding deals with Freeport have always been put into question.
Jokowi can continue with the
ease in the export ban to facilitate Freeport, but he should not throw in the
towel by not demanding more, particularly to force it to immediately sell 51
percent of its shares to local shareholders as stated in the CoW.
After all, Freeport has always
demanded that the government abide by the CoW, and it is fair to request
Freeport to similarly do so.
The main stake at play is no
longer smelter construction and export permits, but divestment. This is where
Freeport tends to hide from its obligations and uses other issues to distract
the public from the real one.
Perhaps the President needs to
be reminded that such divestment is obligatory under the 1945 Constitution,
Article 33 point 3: The land, the waters and the natural resources within shall
be under the powers of the state and shall be used to the greatest benefit of
the people.
With many of his signature
policies running aground, the last thing Jokowi wants is to be on the list of
Indonesian leaders that have caved to US business interests.
Rendi
Witular
No comments:
Post a Comment