Arrest of ‘chickens’ meant to scare Hong Kong
‘monkey’
On Aug. 24,
police in Macau arrested a number of activists and closed a series of unofficial
polling stations where citizens had been invited to vote on whether they had
confidence in Chief Executive Fernando Chui Sai-on.
The crackdown
in Macau is being regarded as another signal that Beijing’s ant-democracy
campaign is heating up just as it claiming to offer universal suffrage to the
people of Hong Kong, a claim greeted with widespread suspicion in the
territory, just 65 km. across the mouth of the Pearl River from Macau.
Chui’s first
five-year term is up in December and he is standing for re-election – a
foregone conclusion since there is no other candidate.
The political
apparatus put in place with Portugal’s relinquishment of the once-sleepy 442
year-old enclave in 1999 is theoretically designed to mirror Hong Kong’s
“one-country, two systems” government that the former British colony put in
place in 1997. However, from the start, Macau has felt the heat from China more
than Hong Kong has. The political regime, clearly directed from Beijing,
appears reluctant to go through the motions of a contest. The 400 individuals
allowed to vote out of a population of 625,000 will rubber-stamp Chui’s second
term just as he was first “elected” by a near unanimous vote with no opponent.
That is not
to say however that there is no opposition to Chui within a traditionally
apolitical Macao. Discontent has been simmering for some time with mass
protests by workers and other signs of unhappiness. While Chui has presided
over a phenomenal growth rate in the territory’s economy, the growth has been
entirely based on the gambling industry where turnover now exceeds that of Las
Vegas by an astonishing margin. Macau's gaming market generated $47.89 billion
in revenue against US$6.52 billion for the 12 months ended May 31.
Needless to
say, enormous amounts of that revenue are flowing down from the mainland,
generating industrial-scale money laundering by mainlanders despite official
government attempts to stop it. The organized crime activities which casinos
everywhere attract has not helped deliver clean and accountable governance to
Macau despite the well-publicized jailing in 1999 of Wan Kuok-koi, better known
as Broken Tooth Koi, the leader until his arrest of the 14K Triad.
Most of the
benefits of the casino boom are regarded as having gone to the casino operators,
five of which are among the leading stocks listed on the Hong Kong stock
exchange, where organizers and financiers of junket operators are also
represented by lesser known counters. Senior employees of casinos, five-star
hotels and luxury brand retailers have also made very good money from the
laundering boom.
But for
ordinary Macanese the influx of tourists and mainland flight money into local
real estate has pushed up prices, particularly of apartments, beyond locally
affordable levels while real wages for the unskilled and semi-skilled
have stagnated.
The irony is
remarkable that a regime which survives by being “patriotic” and allowing no
real political debate also continues as the laundering center for money which
should be captured by President Xi Jinping’s anti-corruption campaign.
But the fate
of even the most minor expressions of political dissent in Macau is another
clear signal to Hong Kong that words like democracy and liberalism are foreign
imports which threaten national security – or at least the security of the
Communist Party elite headed by Xi, who himself seems destined to want to
develop a personality cult around himself, if the Chinese propaganda machine’s
recent activities are any measure.
For Hong Kong
this means being offered a version of “universal suffrage” which is regarded by
critics as a joke and which is likely to be rejected by pro-democracy forces
that can prevent Beijing’s proposals passing the legislature by the necessary
two thirds majority.
Beijing will
not actually be unhappy with this as its legions of acolytes, headed by
officials feeding at the government trough, will then claim that democrats
rejected democracy. The democracy they have in mind is for the people to have a
choice between two candidates carefully vetted by Beijing and approved by an
election committee composed mostly of pro-government stooges. This is
barely an advance on the Macao – or North Vietnam – model.
Apparently
Chinese civilization is so fragile that patriotism means accepting that Chinese
people are incapable of thinking for themselves and must always be guided by
the party which brought the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, and others
disasters, and now is intent on diverting attention from new failures by
threatening its non-Chinese neighbors, Japan, Vietnam and the Philippines. Asia
Sentinel
No comments:
Post a Comment