Has
Malaysia been frightened into silence?
The global criticism that
Malaysia and particularly Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak and Defense Minister
Hishamuddin Hussein received four months ago for their handling of the
disappearance of MH 370 appears to have frightened them into near silence.
It would have been expected
that, like the Dutch, Australians and others, they would have been boiling over
with anger at the shooting down of MH 17 over eastern Ukraine. But instead of
outrage, instead of joining the global chorus of condemnation of what the
Dutch, like the whole of Europe, know to have been the responsibility at least
indirectly, of Russia through its arming of the Ukraine rebels with
sophisticated weapons, there has been almost complete silence from Malaysia’s
leaders.
In a July 21 statement,
Najib appeared to try to defend himself from allegations of inaction by saying
that the silence was necessary to try to secure a deal with the rebels for the
return of the bodies before the end of Ramadan and of the “black box” flight
recorders, and the entry of independent international inspectors who could
establish more precisely the causes of the disaster and hence assign blame more
precisely.
In fact, Malaysia’s
involvement in behind-the-scenes bargaining with the rebels was very much
second fiddle to the Dutch, who not only suffered the most deaths in the crash
but were also better equipped to examine the evidence. Yet the Dutch showed no
signs of letting their desire to negotiate the return of bodies get in the way
of strong backing for European Union sanctions against Russia, predicated on
the belief by all the EU members that Russia was ultimately responsible via its
surrogates in eastern Ukraine, and perhaps more directly.
The failure of Najib to
criticize Russia demands explanation. He has hidden behind the fiction that
only independent international experts can assign responsibility. In doing so
the Malaysian leader has given some credence to the Russian claim that Ukraine
itself was responsible. That almost no one else, other than the usual gang of
anti-western conspiracy theorists, believes that makes Najib seem at best a
weak leader fearful of causing offense to Russia despite the huge blow to the
nation as well as to the families of the Malaysian bereaved caused by the
destruction of MH 17. It is a weakness that since the 2013 general elections
has telegraphed through a wide range of Malaysian domestic politics including
his refusal to take on the Sultan of Johor, who is busy taking over the state
despite constitutional limitations that theoretically render him a ceremonial
leader.
It is not as though
Malaysia has strong links either of trade, investment, history or ideology with
Russia. Indeed, the oppression suffered by Muslims in Russian states in the
Caucasus (notably Chechnya) and central Asia should be of some concern. But
even so the ministers who took so much abuse for their handling of what remains
a mystery remain silent in the face of a Russia-inspired outrage, the mass
murder of nearly 300 people including many Malaysians.
Lurking in the background
of all this is Najib’s fear of the Mahathir faction within UMNO which would
like to unseat him. Following the old man, these believe, or purport to
believe, all kinds of theories. Thus the fact that President Obama has
condemned the Russians and the US produced strong evidence of the missile
attack becomes a reason to disbelieve this story.
The Americans are always
wrong so the Russians must be right. The current brutality being visited by a
US-backed racist Israel on the people of Gaza, becomes an excuse for not
criticizing Russia. Najib would be justified in condemning Israel in the
strongest terms if he also took on the Russians.
Najib certainly has reason
to fear a Mahathir who has long fed Malay paranoia. Just as some supposedly
educated Malays – including Mahathir, writing on his blog Che Det, believe that
the disappearance of MH370 was some kind of a CIA plot, so the destruction of
MH 17 was a western-backed effort by Ukraine to denigrate Moscow.
But while Najib is no
believer in such theories, he lacks the guts to speak up, to lead Malaysia into
the real world, not the make-believe world inhabited by many Malays long
protected from reality by racial preferences. Asia Sentinel
More to the MH17 story than meets the eye
ReplyDeleteJuly 23, 2014 1:00 am
In The Nation's July 20 edition, three articles concern the removal of evidence from the crash site. Since Kiev's team was not there, how could they know the facts, and what is there to remove anyway from a debris field?
As to the restrictions on OSCE observers, these are military personnel with no need to be there. They are not from Boeing (airframe), General Electric (engines), etc.
Western media fingers are pointed at Russian involvement, but other sources provide conflicting information. For example, according to a Spanish air controller in Ukraine, the Kiev military authority informed the control tower of the downing at noon, approximately ten minutes after it disappeared from the radar screen. How could they have known without having concrete details on it being shot down?
Thomas Turk
Phuket