The CCP has a history of monitoring political
unrest around the world closely. The Arab Spring is no different
As the Arab Spring enters its third year, events in the
region remain fluid. Still, enough time has now passed that some preliminary
conclusions can be reached.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is one institution
certainly drawing lessons from the Arab Spring. It is well known that the CCP
studies political unrest in other parts of the world in search of lessons it
can use to maintain stability at home. The most notable instance of this was the massive study the CCP undertook into the
causes of the Soviet Union’s collapse. The lessons the CCP drew from its more
than decade-long study into the Soviet bloc have since been incorporated into
the curriculum at party schools, and are regularly referred to by senior
Chinese officials.
Although the CCP’s study of the Arab Spring won’t be nearly
as massive, the events in the Arab world are of significant interest to the
party for a number of reasons. The first is simply their size and magnitude.
Additionally, in its early days the Arab Spring inspired some Chinese to call
for a Jasmine Revolution in China. Although nothing much came from these calls,
there were a tense couple of weeks in China that saw
the CCP on high alert.
Finally, Chinese leaders should be particularly interested
in the Arab Spring simply because it provides an excellent case study. Although
the protests seemed to be motivated by similar causes, they quickly diverged in
terms of how each government responded, as well as their ultimate outcomes.
Thus, the protests offer valuable lessons for how the CCP can maintain power in
China. Four points from the Arab Spring seem particularly pertinent:
1) Get Ahead of Events
The regimes that have best weathered the Arab Spring have
gotten ahead of events on the ground. At the first sight of unrest in Egypt,
Saudi Arabia sought to preempt protests by significantly increasing subsides.
The Gulf Cooperation Council contained unrest in Bahrain by using overwhelming
force to smother the then-nascent protests. Only after order had been restored
did the government begin offering small concessions. In other
countries like Morocco and Jordan, governments quickly appeased protesters by
offering at least cosmetic concessions, such as removing especially unpopular
leaders. The new Chinese leadership seems to be pursuing a similar course by initiating highly publicized anti-graft and mass
line campaigns that are partly aimed at reducing public anger over the party’s
excesses.
2) Control the Media
The Arab Spring reaffirmed the importance of controlling the
media. Like other recent protest movements, the Arab Spring has shown the
centrality of social media in protestors’ ability to organize demonstrations
and sustain momentum for their causes. Governments that can shut down social
media sites have a significantly better chance at weathering unrest.
No government is as better positioned to achieve this than
the CCP. As one recent study concluded, “The size and
sophistication of the Chinese government’s program to selectively censor the
expressed views of the Chinese people is unprecedented in recorded world
history.” Although social media is increasingly popular in China, all the major
Western social media sites are banned. Instead, Chinese netizens use national
social media sites that the CCP would almost certainly move to temporarily
shutter in the event of significant protests.
The Arab Spring has also demonstrated the value of imposing
an international media blackout. The Arab regimes that have been able to
prevent independent reporting have been significantly less constrained in the
level of repression they can employ. This was best demonstrated in the case of
Bahrain. The Syrian government’s ban on foreign reporters has also been highly
effective. Despite the daring efforts of some journalists who were able to sneak
into the country, much of the carnage in Syria has gone undocumented. Had the
deaths of more than a 100,000 Syrians been broadcast live on al Jazeera,
Western leaders would have been under much more intense pressure to intervene.
It’s therefore likely that if significant unrest breaks out in China, the CCP
will move quickly to deport all foreign journalists.
3) Divide the Populace
Many of the successful Arab Spring movements have been in
homogeneous countries. By contrast, regimes that have successfully exploited
existing social cleavages have fared far better. Thus, the Saudi and Bahraini
governments have successfully depicted their protest movements as disgruntled
Shi’a taking cues from Iran. Similarly, Bashar al-Assad has managed to deprive
the Sunni majority population of support from any of Syria’s minority groups.
He has also kept the Sunni opposition divided amongst itself. Even the Yemeni
government has managed to hold onto some power by exploiting its many
divisions.
In some regards, this holds limited utility for the CCP,
given that the Han population in China accounts for more than 91 percent of the
country. Still, because of this, the CCP will likely go to great lengths to
depict any initial violent acts—like the recent attack in Tiananmen Square—as
being perpetrated by an ethnic group. Furthermore, while China is ethnically
Han, there are many regional divisions within the country that the CCP already uses to its advantage.
4) Unite the elites
Finally, the Arab Spring has once again demonstrated the
resilience of governments that can maintain elite cohesion. The seeds of Hosni
Mubarak’s rapid downfall were planted months before protests began when he and
the military began a fierce power struggle over the issue of succession.
Mubarak’s actual successor, Mohammed Morsi, also fell quickly thanks to a lack
of military support. Similarly, although the Yemeni government hasn’t
completely collapsed, it has effectively lost control over large sways of the
country chiefly because it failed the win the backing of key power brokers.
Egypt and Yemen contrast sharply with the Syrian revolution in which Assad has
been able to retain the support of the Alawite minority that make up the bulk
of the elites before the protests began.
This is the area in which the CCP is weakest. Loyalty to the
Communist Party has declined precipitously over the years, and most Chinese now
join the CCP purely for personal economic gain. But even these economic perks will decrease as the CCP
looks to rebalance to a consumer-driven economy. Whether ordinary Party
members—including members of the security forces and army—will fight for these
declining benefits could significantly shape China’s future. ‘The Diplomat’
No comments:
Post a Comment