Refugees on the border face increased
hardship as funds dry up ahead of their expected repatriation
With once-isolated Myanmar opening up
since 2010 elections installed a civilian government, more international aid
has poured into the country and NGOs from the West have rushed to set up headquarters
there.
However, around 130,000 refugees –
mostly members of the Karen ethnic group who fled a bloody
conflict in their homeland in eastern Myanmar – still live in camps on the
Thai side of the border.
Both governments, along with refugee
groups and the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, have been negotiating their
return, although no timeframe has been set. Yet with the funding drying up, aid
workers on the border say the situation is become increasingly desperate.
“The funding available for
humanitarian support is decreasing,” says Sally Thompson, head of The Border
Consortium (TBC), a group of 10 international NGOs working in the field. “In
2014 we will still find ways to support refugees, but we have got to do it more
efficiently. There are no spare funds.”
Many refugees will see their rice
rations for December cut as households are categorized according to need.
Although the most needy households will receive more rice – alongside meager
rations of split peas, vegetable oil, flour and fishpaste – the cuts are driven
by reductions in funding for food aid.
Thompson says the protracted nature
of the situation on the border, the opening up
of Myanmar – formerly known as Burma – and talk of the refugees returning
within the next few years make it increasingly difficult to attract funding.
Many have no wish to return anyway.
The first camps opened in 1984, and now more than half the population is aged
under 19. “Most of the youth in the camps don’t know what a life is like in
Burma, they don’t relate to a life in Burma,” says Thompson. “Their formative
years have all been here in Thailand.”
In the camps, they have had access to
basic healthcare and education provided by international NGOs, as well as
vocational training in subjects such as mechanics, hairdressing, baking and
tailoring. If they are sent back to
Karen state, which lacks even the most basic infrastructure, they can look
forward to little more than a life based on subsistence farming.
For decades following Myanmar’s
independence in 1948, the Karen fought a bloody war for independence or greater
autonomy. A ceasefire was signed early last year, but the Myanmar army still
maintains a strong presence in the area, prompting fear and suspicion among
those who fled the atrocities it carried out.
Although Thai authorities bar residents
from leaving the camps, many do find work locally, leaving themselves open to
arrest and exploitation. They usually receive less than the minimum wage, and
unscrupulous employers often refuse to pay them at all. Young women are
especially vulnerable to sexual abuse by employers and authority figures such
as policemen and government officials.
Some refugees with an entrepreneurial
spirit have found ways to make a living in the camps by selling everything from
food to clothing and mobile phones. But to make its limited funds go further,
the TBC says it now needs to focus its efforts on those it considers most
vulnerable, and is encouraging those who can to take more responsibility for
themselves.
“They do a lot for themselves now,
they always have done,” says a clearly frustrated Thompson at her office in
downtown Bangkok. “They haven’t been lying around indolently and doing nothing,
but on the other hand their choices have been very restricted, so they have
been very dependent on what the international humanitarian community has
provided.”
Admitting that the level of
assistance now provided is “extremely marginal,” she adds: “We are asking them
to take more risks because we don’t have the funds. It’s not good to have to do
that. We are asking people to look at what the risks are and how to protect
themselves.”
The TBC – formerly known as the
Thai-Burma Border Consortium – opened an office in Yangon in August, in
preparation for the return of the refugees. Many think this could take place
after elections due in Myanmar in 2015, if they go ahead peacefully and are
deemed free and fair.
Among the organizations that are
feeling the pinch as the funding dries up is the renowned Mae Tao Clinic in the
Thai border town of Mae Sot. It was set up in 1989 by Dr. Cynthia Maung, an
ethnic Karen who fled the fighting in her home country and has since won
many awards for her humanitarian work.
The clinic now treats around 100,000
patients a year. Nearly half of these travel from Myanmar to receive treatment,
and the rest are migrant workers living in Thailand.
In July, the Australian overseas aid
agency AusAID announced that it was cutting its funding to the clinic, and Dr.
Maung says many donors have yet to commit beyond 2015, when 40 per cent of the
current funding runs out.
The clinic’s budget is around 100 to
120 million baht ($3.1 – $3.7 million) a year, including 10-12 million baht
annually from the British government.
Like Thompson, Dr. Maung is concerned
that health and education services currently provided by civic organizations on
the border will suffer from the cuts, noting that it will take years to build
up decent infrastructure in Myanmar.
“We are a big organization so we have
more access to funding than other, smaller organizations, but we are struggling
and trying to readjust our programs,” she said. “The big problem is smaller
organizations and schools… We worry about the child labor issue, if the schools
aren’t open and there is no access to education.”
Dr. Maung hasn’t been back to Myanmar
since she fled in the aftermath of the 1988 student uprising that led to a
brutal crackdown by the ruling military, but she says there is a need to build
stronger civil society organizations there. She hopes to go back one day, but
in the meantime wants to continue her work treating migrant workers and
refugees.
“The border is very unique,” she
says. “We belong to both countries.”
Mark Fenn is a journalist based in
Bangkok. He has written for many publications including The Times, The
Independent, South China Morning Post, and the Far East Economic
Review.
No comments:
Post a Comment