Politics in Myanmar
A younger generation emerges from Aung San Suu Kyi’s shadow and tries to turn her party into a government-in-waiting
SQUATTING on the bare floor of a sparsely furnished flat in
central Yangon, a handful of 20-somethings tap furiously on battered old
laptops, occasionally glancing at pieces of paper scattered around them. They
could easily pass for a group of teenagers trawling Facebook. In fact, this is
the research unit of the National League for Democracy (NLD), Myanmar’s main
opposition party, led by Aung San Suu Kyi. They are racing to meet a deadline
to produce a weekly media-monitoring report, providing links to all the main
references to the NLD and Myanmar in the international press. It is sent to NLD
MPs and party leaders.
If it all looks fairly amateurish, that is because it is.
They have no office, so the unit has to meet at the flat of Nay Chi Win, the
founder and granddaddy of the group at the age of 32. The only obvious office
accessory is a whiteboard, and his main worry is whether he can afford the
rent. Nonetheless, the founding of the research unit earlier this year is one
of several signs that the NLD is starting to grasp the urgent need for its own
transformation.
Founded in 1988 by Miss Suu Kyi and others to oppose
Myanmar’s brutal military rulers, the NLD has spent most of its life barely
able to function. Its leaders were imprisoned and tortured, many members were
driven into exile and the party was declared illegal. Since 2011, however, in
the wake of President Thein Sein’s democratic reforms, the NLD has been on the
brink of power. It won 43 of the 44 seats it contested in by-elections in 2012.
If that were replicated nationally at the 2015 general election, the NLD would
sweep the next parliament and Miss Suu Kyi could become president.
It has been a joyful, if at times bewildering, reversal in
the NLD’s fortunes. Yet many, even within the party, argue that it has been
slow to catch up with the changes. Some harsh criticisms emerged at the party’s
first national congress in March: that the NLD is dominated by the old guard of
leaders in their 70s or 80s; that Miss Suu Kyi is aloof and inaccessible; and
that members have almost no voice in policy-making. Indeed, some complain that
there is little policy-making apparatus at all, making the party dangerously
underprepared for government in just two years’ time. Alert to these
criticisms, younger NLD members have realised that it is up to them to professionalise
the party.
The research unit is a good example. It was set up on Mr Nay
Chi Win’s own initiative, as part of an effort to “decentralise” and
“institutionalise”, as he puts it, a party that had become over-reliant on the
personal leadership of Miss Suu Kyi. Apart from producing the media monitoring
report, the unit also has three people researching subjects such as climate
change and the rule of law.
It is also involved in a training programme for NLD members
in local branches around the country. The cadres who come to Yangon get courses
in the practice of running a modern political party, including basic office
management and public relations. Taking a leaf out of the book of New Labour in
Britain, they even have a course in personal grooming, given by Tin Moe Lwin, a
famous model. As Mr Nay Chi Win argues, “this is a bottom-up process, the
membership coming up with ideas.”
The leadership, too, has been involved in training. All NLD
MPs can now take computer and internet courses in Naypyidaw, the capital. MPs
have also been sent to America to study English and learn about democracy. Miss
Suu Kyi herself has helped to set up an NLD youth congress; it hopes to meet
for the first time in December or early next year.
Isolated icon
Critics still point to the continuing isolation of Miss Suu
Kyi (who is stuck in Naypyidaw much of the time) from the rest of the party and
her unwillingness to delegate urgently needed policy thinking to others. For
months the NLD leadership has been focusing on getting parliament to change
clauses in the constitution that would make Miss Suu Kyi eligible to become
president in 2015. It is a crucial task but has distracted leaders from
formulating viable economic policies.
Such arguments plainly irritate Miss Suu Kyi’s overworked
advisers. They argue that people have to be realistic about what can be
achieved in a short time and on a slender budget. And just as some attack Miss
Suu Kyi for being aloof, she is equally frustrated by the fact that people are
so in awe of her that they will not dare argue or debate with her. Fame allows
her to command a world audience, but it can also isolate her from her own
people. The Economist
No comments:
Post a Comment