The latest
developments in Indonesian markets reflect both long-term and short-term
factors
Suddenly there are signs
of pressure in the Indonesia economy. Until recently, the economy seemed to be
doing well. But growth is now slowing, inflation is rising, the balance of
payments is under pressure, and the value of the rupiah has slumped. Why the
change in economic fortunes?
The longer-term factors include a
range of issues which have been a source of comment within Indonesia for some
time. At the broadest level, something of an inward-looking mood appears to
have been influencing policies during the past year or so. Senior policy makers
have emphasised that the broad approach being promoted, which is one of looking
for ways to strengthen Indonesian industries, is not protectionist. Policies of
this kind, policy makers argue, will strengthen the resilience of the
Indonesian economy by providing greater economic security which will shield
both Indonesian producers and consumers from the vagaries of uncertain
international conditions.
There is much to be said for the
long-term aim of building up domestic Indonesian industries and emphasising key
goals such as food and energy security. But a number of well-publicised
policies during the past few years have been somewhat interventionist, and have
arguably had an anti-market flavour about them.
Policies in the mining
sector, for example, have not been especially successful in promoting growth.
Output has been falling steadily for over a decade in the oil sector, a
previous source of strong exports and government revenues during the 1980s and
1990s. Indonesia, formerly a significant oil-exporting nation, has now become
an oil importer and the rising levels of oil imports have become a significant
strain on the balance of payments.
In the non-oil mining sectors,
investors view some key policy approaches as being excessively interventionist.
Mining firms in various industries have been told to install smelters and to
process their resources before export. Government directives to this effect are
expected to be implemented regardless of whether additional processing in
Indonesia is profitable or not.
These directives, along with a range
of other structural policies in other sectors, appear to have had the
unintended effect of holding back the expansion of exports while adding to the
national import bill.
In good times, when the
international economy is strong and when international financiers are keen to
invest in emerging market economies, developing countries such as Indonesia
perhaps have room to take risks with experimental structural policies. But when
international conditions are more difficult, markets and investors are less
tolerant.
The short-term problem for Indonesia
now is that markets have suddenly turned less tolerant, due to three recent
developments. First, the slowdown of economic growth in China has led to a fall
in demand for Indonesia’s exports. Second, US Fed chairman Ben Bernanke’s
indications that the remarkable period of loose monetary policy in the US might
be drawing to an end has led to something of a global flight of capital from
emerging markets. And third, India’s current economic woes
have led to concerns that these problems might spread to other countries across
the region through a process of contagion, as was the case in the Asian
Financial Crisis of 1997–98.
But it is too early to see the
current developments in Indonesian markets as a threat to longer-term growth.
For one, policy makers have responded swiftly. On 23 August, Indonesia
announced a package of comprehensive fiscal and
monetary policies as a response to the pressures in the financial
and trade markets. And, to strengthen the package, just a few days ago (29
August) the central bank Bank Indonesia increased interest rates to 7 per cent.
For another, Indonesia has a very
strong team of economic policy makers. Vice President Boediono has many years
of experience in both monetary and fiscal policy matters, including during the
Asian Financial Crisis. He is supported by the Minister of Finance, Dr Chatib
Basri, and the Governor of Bank Indonesia, Agus Martowardojo, both of whom are
known for their firm commitment to sound economic policies.
Finally, some of the short-term
pressures that Indonesia is facing may even prove to be a blessing in disguise.
The recent period of strong growth during the past few years may have lulled
some policy makers in Indonesia into believing that economic success is
guaranteed. If so, an economic rap over the knuckles to remind them that
international markets are both fickle and powerful may be no bad thing.
By Peter McCawley Visiting Fellow at the Crawford School of
Public Policy, Australian National University.
No comments:
Post a Comment