Ironical
as it may sound, even as the elephant is venerated as god in India, the animal
is ruthlessly poached for its tusk which are used to make ivory and are even
touted as a cure for several maladies, including baldness in men.
The
elephant in India has been facing the same fate as the tiger, whose numbers
declined alarmingly, despite schemes like Project Tiger, which was launched in
1972. There is a lot of similarity between the tiger and the elephant. Both are
killed for their body parts. While tiger skins are used as drawing-room
decorations and the big cat’s organs used for “curing” even sexual impotency,
the tusks of elephants translate into delicate ivory curios — and there is
a huge market for these.
However, while the tiger — prided as India’s national animal — got a lot
of attention, the elephant attracted but very little. And it comes as little
surprise that 100 pachyderms were reportedly slaughtered in the forests of
southern India (Tamil Nadu, Kerala and Karnataka) during the past 24 months.
This is being seen as the biggest ever poaching since 2004, the year the forest
brigand, Veerappan, was shot dead.
He had butchered about 75 elephants between 1975 and 1985 in these
forests, but other poachers appear to have done far better than him. They
“finished off “100 of these animals in just two years.
This is probably only to be expected, given the kind of gadgets today’s
poachers have. They use state-of-the-art weapons like AK 47 rifles, sport
night-vision glasses and travel in sophisticated vehicles.
On the other hand, forest guards, meant for protecting wild life, are
poorly equipped. Sometimes, they do not even have proper footwear — falling
prey to blood-sucking leeches and venomous snakes. Often, they carry batons
(lathis) , not firearms, and do not have vehicles.
How then do they chase the poacher or even engage him in a combat?
On top of all this is the man-elephant conflict, given the shrinking
animal habitat. When forests are cleared for agricultural cultivation or
setting up factories, pachyderms not only lose their homes, but also their
migratory corridors, making it difficult for the animals to move unhindered
from one area to another in search of food and water.
So, obviously, elephants begin to destroy crops for their food — and to
create a corridor to pass through.
In this struggle, some of the animals are electrocuted or poisoned by
villagers, angry about the destruction of their crops and sometimes even their
houses. When these lead to economic losses, villagers are only too willing to
shake hands with poachers, who promise the poor folks a share of the ivory
loot.
Yes, the connivance of forest guards or senior officials is essential if
poachers are to have a smooth killing. No wonder, there was a forest range
officer and a deputy range officer among the 40 men who were arrested in
southern India in recent weeks. And huge quantities of tusks have been
confiscated.
Poaching of tuskers — which is also common in some other parts of the
country, like the states of Odisha, West Bengal and Assam and a few
regions in central India — has also resulted in a serious
sex-ratio-imbalance in areas like Kerala — 1 bull:122 females. This means
unhealthy in-breeding within a group.
In the final analysis, the rapid decline in the number of Indian tuskers
— there are about 20,000 wild elephants now in the country — can be largely
attributed to the flourishing world trade in ivory and people’s craving for
fancy objects made from it. China is one of the biggest importers of ivory — as
it is one of the largest markets for tiger parts, which also come from outside.
In fact, much like the tiger story in India — which took a tragic turn
with the rising demand for the animal’s organs (the penis soup is not just a
delicacy, but is “guaranteed” to increase male libido) in China, elephant
poaching had worsened after the Convention on International Trade in
Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna (CITES) allowed China to
import 108 tonnes of ivory from Botswana, Namibia, South Africa and
Zimbabwe in 2008 in a one-off sale even as the ban on ivory trade had been in
force since 1990. Experts believe that this could have been an important
reason for renewed elephant killing in India.
Similarly, when CITES allowed Japan to buy 34 tonnes of ivory from
Namibia and Zimbabwe in 1999, the Indian tusker suffered. (Only the males among
Asian elephants have tusks, while some females of the species in Africa have
them).
The picture is as grim in Africa, where elephants are being slaughtered
on an unimaginable scale. In 2012, more than 35,000 of them—or close to 100 a
day—were killed for their tusks. Things turned particularly ugly in 2013, when
more than 300 fell victim to cyanide poisoning by poachers in Zimbabwe. If
things go on like this, the African elephant may be extinct in just 15 years
from now.
The solution to save the elephant does not have two ways about it. In
India, as elsewhere, poaching has to stop, and in some African countries,
governments themselves are guilty of this crime, lured as they are by the huge
profits which this “white gold” fetches.
In India, underpaid forest officials are tempted by the big money that
poaching promises. And poorly armed forest guards are not always willing to
gamble away their lives in elephant country.
But, ultimately, the world — which is also you and me — has to take a
pledge that it will not be part of this business of murdering elephants. Come on,
we do not have to decorate our homes with ivory or build little castles
(models of the Taj Mahal made out of ivory are still a big draw) out of it by
digging a grave for that majestic creature we call elephant.
Gautaman Bhaskaran is an author, commentator and movie critic, who has worked with The
Statesman in Kolkata and The Hindu in Chennai for 35 years. He now writes for
the Hindustan Times, the Gulf Times and The Seoul Times.
No comments:
Post a Comment