Five hedge funds are testing Indonesia’s legal protections for foreign
investors after a local court barred them from Bakrie Telecom’s debt
restructuring talks.
The funds and one other bondholder are asking a New York court to quash
a ruling by a Jakarta district judge that they cannot vote on the workout
arrangements because their defaulted notes were issued by an offshore
special-purpose vehicle.
The investors, who own 28 percent of the $380 million May 2015
dollar-denominated securities, said in the suit they would recover less than 20
cents on the dollar under the plan.
Leading global asset managers are watching the dispute with interest
because almost 90 percent of all Indonesian non-state corporate dollar notes
have been issued via offshore entities similar to that used by the telephone
company, which is part of the Bakrie conglomerate, a group with two other
entities in restructuring.
President Joko Widodo
can ill afford to irk foreign investors after outlining plans to build 25 dams
in five years, 24 ports and six mass transport systems to spur an economy that
grew at the slowest pace since 2009 last year.
“We want to know how
bondholders are treated everywhere we invest so we watch closely key bankruptcy
rulings,” said Benjamin Cryer, a Singapore-based portfolio manager for the
Franklin Asia Credit Fund of Franklin Templeton Investments, a unit of Franklin
Resources.
“Bondholders expect to
be treated fairly in a restructuring and if they can just be excluded from the
process, investors will at the very least require some additional safety in
future issues.”
Less credit
Doubts over the
ability to enforce the rights of foreign investors could reduce the
availability of credit to smaller companies from Indonesia, Cryer said.
Bond issuers may have
to start offering additional assurance in writing that foreign creditor rights
will be respected, he said.
The dispute threatens
to overshadow Indonesia’s position as the best performing country this year in
JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s Asia Credit Index series. Returns total 5 percent.
“Indonesian bonds and
mainly Indonesian high-yield bonds should trade wider than other similar rated
emerging market bonds,” as a result of the recent ruling, Brigitte Posch, the
London-based head of emerging market corporate debt at Babson Capital
Management, which controls some $212 billion, said.
Bakrie Telecom hasn’t
reported an annual profit since 2010, according to Bloomberg data, after
focusing on a mobile phone technology that’s lost popularity.
“We are still reading
the situation so we can’t give any official comment on this matter just yet,”
Niko Margaronis, Bakrie Telecom’s head of investor relations, said.
Coffee, steel
Achmad Bakrie started
what would become the Bakrie group in 1942, trading rubber and coffee, before
expanding to steel, energy and property.
His son, Aburizal,
struggled to repay $1.1 billion of debt when currencies plunged in the 1997
Asian financial crisis, and was forced to give away most of the family empire
to creditors.
The group rebounded
along with Indonesia’s economy until the companies accounted for 15 percent of
the Jakarta stock exchange’s market value in June 2008.
The eight companies’
combined weighting has since shrunk to less than 1 percent.
Coal and palm oil have
slid 48 percent and 38 percent respectively since the end of 2010, weighing on
sales for miner Bumi Resources and Bakrie Sumatera Plantations.
Property sales for
Bakrieland Development were hampered by 1.75 percentage points of increases in
Indonesia’s benchmark interest rate in 2013.
All three companies
are restructuring their debt, or have done in the past two years.
Bondholders sue
Bank of New York
Mellon, the defaulted notes’ trustee, is representing bondholders in the
restructuring, according to the notes’ contract.
Bank of New York
Mellon as trustee was excluded from the process, and executives of a company
subsidiary named Bakrie Telecom voted on the plan in its place, according to
the Feb. 18 court document.
The five hedge funds
are Universal Investment Advisory, Universal Absolute Return, Vaquero Master EM
Credit Fund, Footbridge Capital and Growth Credit Fund, the document shows.
The bondholders suing
in New York didn’t participate in the vote, according to Joel Hogarth, a
partner at Ashurst, which represents Bakrie Telecom.
Even if they had, the
dissenting votes amounted to about 18 percent of the company’s total debt, he
said in an e-mail, suggesting they wouldn’t have had enough power to change the
outcome of the workout anyway.
Mexican glassmaker
In 2012, Vitro,
Mexico’s biggest glassmaker, explored a loophole in the local law to allow
executives from its subsidiaries to steer its debt workout in a similar manner
to Bakrie Telecom, leaving holders of $1.2 billion of bonds with losses of more
than 40 percent.
The local ruling was
challenged in the US by hedge funds including Paul Singer’s Elliot Management
and a court decided the Mexican plan wasn’t worthy of enforcement.
While bondholders
owned less of Vitro’s debt than its subsidiaries, and hence had less power in
the restructuring, they were still allowed to vote in the process.
“I can’t think of any
other case in which the special purpose vehicle investors were not allowed to
vote in a restructuring,” as happened with Bakrie Telecom, James Harper, the
head of research at BCP Securities in Connecticut, said.
“That puts Indonesia
in a bad light.”
The government expects
total investment in projects this year to reach 516.5 trillion rupiah ($40
billion), up 11.5 percent from 2014, with two thirds of that money coming from
abroad.
Offshore cash
“It’s clear that the
new government in Indonesia is trying to attract more offshore capital into the
country and it will be very sensitive to perceptions of discriminatory
treatment,” said Jim Jagger, a senior vice president and portfolio manager at
Aviva Investors Global Services.
The Indonesian
bankruptcy law was amended in 1998 to allow companies to remain operational
while restructuring their debt, as part of an agreement with the International
Monetary Fund, Gary Bell, an associate professor of law at the National
University of Singapore said.
“While the law follows
the framework of Chapter 11 in the US, local judges often have very different
interpretations of it from what would be seen elsewhere in the world,” Bell
said.
“When an Indonesian
company goes into bankruptcy, the proceeding will happen in a local court, and
there is nothing global investors can do about that.”
Bloomberg
No comments:
Post a Comment