As violence escalates in West Papua,
one cannot help but recall East Timor and wonder how much worse it must get
before Australia and the international community will act.
Tensions are at breaking point in
the easternmost province of Indonesia after the police shooting of independence
activist Mako Tabuni.
Human rights activists report Tabuni
was unarmed when shot six times by the Australian-trained Detachment 88 forces.
Tabuni was deputy chairman of the West Papua National Committee, an
organisation advocating independence and the right to self-determination under
international law. Tabuni had also been campaigning for an investigation into a
recent spate of military killings
The shooting follows years of violence. At least 16 people have been killed in the past month, according to human rights groups, and hundreds of homes raided, with many burnt to the ground. Thousands are reported to be evacuating, seeking refuge in the forest or heading for refugee camps in Papua New Guinea. Credible reports of human rights violations by Indonesian security forces have emerged, including torture, excessive use of force and extrajudicial killings.
Yet Indonesia's State Intelligence
Agency chief, Lieutenant-General Marciano Norman, placed blame on the Free
Papua Movement, ''foreign agents'' and local residents for the violence. The
President, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, played down the events. As Indonesia
obfuscates and Australia remains silent, West Papua bleeds. While most Australians
are proud of our role in ending 24 years of bloody Indonesian occupation in
East Timor, we should not forget it came after a long history of accepting
Indonesian assertions of sovereignty while ignoring human rights abuse on our
doorstep.
After East Timor, we cannot claim
any wide-eyed innocence regarding West Papua.
Australia is now bidding for a place
on the United Nations Security Council on the basis of our alleged ''human
rights-based foreign policy'', highlighting our role in East Timor while trying
to keep a lid on our history of inaction there.
The federal Attorney-General has
refused freedom of information requests for the release of diplomatic cables
dating to the 1970s - cables that a University of NSW professor, Clinton
Fernandes, says will show Australian complicity in concealing the mass
starvation of Timorese.
Are we now making the same mistakes
with West Papua? Few are aware of Australian and UN involvement in West Papua
30 years before the intervention in East Timor. Like East Timor, West Papua was
annexed by Indonesia in circumstances that violated international law.
Comparisons are made, and with good reason. Both territories are made up of
distinct minorities. Both are rich in natural resources. Both have struggled
for self-determination. Like East Timor, West Papua had a UN vote for
self-determination, only the outcome could not have been more different.
In 1999, East Timor got a proper
vote and won independence (not before an estimated 200,000 Timorese had died).
But in 1969, West Papua got a sham vote and became part of Indonesia.
Last month, East Timor celebrated 10
years of independence or, as the Timorese say, 10 years since the international
community recognised their independence. But an estimated 400,000 Papuans have
now been killed after more than 40 years of Indonesian oppression and abuse.
This year, Indonesia faced
international condemnation for the imprisonment of West Papuan leaders for
peacefully calling for independence. When asked if Australia had raised
concerns with Indonesia, the Foreign Affairs Minister, Bob Carr, responded by
admitting that ''before I could raise the subject … the Indonesian Foreign
Minister nominated that they have a clear responsibility to see that their
sovereignty is upheld in respect of human rights standards'', and Carr ''was
impressed by that''.
In responses eerily similar to
statements made by Gareth Evans about East Timor during Indonesian rule, Carr
warned members of Parliament ''against foolishly talking up'' West Papuans'
right to self-determination because it ''threatens the territorial integrity of
Indonesia'' and ''would produce a reaction'' towards Australia. It would be a
foolish foreign affairs minister who did not learn from our mistakes in East
Timor.
Australia should, at a minimum,
reconsider military aid to Indonesia and call for them to allow media and
international organisations access to West Papua to investigate abuses and
facilitate peaceful dialogue.
East Timor should remind us of the
hefty price of turning a blind eye to repression in the mistaken belief that it
serves stability in our region. As a Deakin University academic, Scott
Burchill, has long argued, it is not only ''a dereliction of our ethical duty,
it is politically short-sighted and usually results in blowback''. The Age,
Melbourne
By Jennifer Robinson an Australian
human rights lawyer in London.
No comments:
Post a Comment