On January 22, the Myanmar government sent a contradictory message on
its sentencing of political prisoners. Naypyidaw released 52 political
prisoners while on the same day sentencing Kachin activist Patrick Khum Jaa Lee
to six months in jail for a Facebook post. The 52 political prisoners released
from five prisons nationwide last week – including Myintkyina, Putaoo and
Insein – were part of the 101 total prisoners released by the government.
The
release of the political prisoners comes after recent pressure on the country’s
current president Thein Sein by international governments and human rights
groups. Following the announcement, some dismissed the amnesty as a cheap
political move by Thein Sein before he leaves office – and a small one at that
given the number.
Assistance
Association for Political Prisoners (AAPP) based in Mae Sot, Thailand, stated that a
“relatively small release of political prisoners demonstrate that the
government continues to harbor resentment and animosity toward those that
oppose them.” The group noted that 408 political prisoners are currently
awaiting trial for political actions.
Myanmar
still has many other political prisoners languishing in jail. For example,
pro-democracy activist Htin Lin Oo was jailed for insulting Buddhism. Additionally,
on January 19, 2007, Saffron Revolution leader U Gambira was re-arrested for
immigration charges. He had previously spent more than four years in prison and
suffers from post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after being tortured and put
in solitary confinement.
Trauma
specialist Rory Wagee, who treated Gambira for PTSD in Chiang Mai, said in a letter circulating
on Twitter and Facebook via journalist Veronica Pedrosa on January 20: “I felt
great sadness and anger when I heard that he had been imprisoned…this action
will have produced a catastrophic effect on his fragile recovery from PTSD.”
“The
experience of imprisonment will have retraumatized Gambira and he will have
already experienced unbearable amounts of psychological suffering since being
arrested,” he wrote.
Another
example is Kachin activist Patrick Khum Jaa Lee, who was arrested without a
warrant and with both his phone and computer confiscated after being charged
under the 2013 Telecommunication Law. According to Burma
Campaign UK, an advocacy organization that works in Myanmar, there are concerns
about his health as he has severe asthma and likely does not have his inhaler
in prison.
Other
activists that should be freed include the over 50 peaceful student protesters
from the March 2015 demonstration against a national education bill in
Letpadan. At the time, police had used excessive force during the crackdown and
brutally beat unarmed protesters with batons.
As far as
we know, at least one student activist Naing Ye Wai was released on January 22.
But the rest continue to suffer in prison. In a new report released on January
25, by All Burma Federation of Student Unions, the Letpadan Justice Committee,
and Justice Trust cites evidence of detainees suffering from serious medical
conditions and no access to healthcare in Thayawaddy Prison. According to
Fortify Rights, 24 of the 53 detainees in Thayawaddy Prison have potentially
life-threatening medical conditions.
“President
Thein Sein and his government bear ultimate responsibility for the treatment of
these detainees and should intervene immediately on their behalf” said Matthew Smith,
executive director of Fortify Rights.
Many
Muslims in Myanmar, particularly the Rohingya, have been sentenced to jail and
long court cases. This includes a well-known case where six men were charged
with publishing a calendar that described the country’s persecuted Muslim
Rohingya, along with another where a dozen men were convicted for supposed
links to an armed group. Both cases, according to activist and human rights
groups, are believed to be politically motivated (See: “Myanmar’s Government Is
Persecuting Muslims Through Court Convictions”).
Many of
the political prisoners in Myanmar are charged for violating section 18 of the
Peaceful Assembly and Peaceful Procession Law, according to Human
Rights Watch. The law requires anyone gathering for public groups to get
advanced approval from the authorities.
Following
the prisoner release, Brad Adams, the Asia director for Human Rights Watch,
said in a written statement
that “amnesties that are followed by the arrest and sentencing of more
government critics cannot be called progress – and instead smack of making room
in jails for new political prisoners…this revolving door of political prisoner
releases and convictions needs to stop.”
If
Myanmar’s government is truly serious about improving its record on political
prisoners, it should release all of them immediately and unconditionally and
send a clear message instead of a contradictory one.
John
Quinley III is a Bangkok-based researcher focused on human rights, refugees,
migrants, and development in Southeast Asia, particularly Myanmar and Thailand.
No comments:
Post a Comment