Someone must have misguided Indian Prime Minister
Narendra Modi to tell a business gathering in New Delhi recently that China’s
pain is India’s gain.
The remark was in bad
taste, to say the least. Moreover, Modi failed to realize that China’s pain was
natural for any economy going through some challenging transformation.
Like Modi, President Xi Jinping was addressing a business gathering in
Seattle in the US Wednesday telling investors how open China is to foreign
business amid economic reforms. But there was no mention of pain or gain in his
talk.
The state-run Chinese daily Global Times thought this the best
occasion to hit back at Modi with an article which said China’s economic pain
cannot be India’s gain as both economies are not at the same level of
development. It was a clear snub.
Then came the advice: Since both economies are not at the same level of
development, they can achieve a mutually beneficial industrial conjunction, a
win-win situation and not a win-lose one.
While China’s economic fluctuation is worrying the international
community, India sees it as an opportunity to acquire a competitive advantage
over China.
The article chides optimists in India who think that China’s stock
market slump may steer foreign investments out of China into India, and that
India can benefit from China’s rising labor costs, based on which international
companies will be inclined to shift their production lines from China to India.
No wonder such excessive optimism to take advantage someone else’s
troubles has raised a public debate in the Indian society and academia, the
article says.
Modi will be in Silicon Valley this weekend and many tech titans will be
courting him.
He will be addressing 17,000 Indian expatriates at San Jose’s Shark Tank
sports arena Sunday. But AU doubts whether he will be able to rock them the way
he did the crowd at a Madison Square Garden rally in New York City in 2014.
Indians had great expectations when
Modi was ushered in as prime minister. But those hopes seem to have faded. By Asia Unhedged
No comments:
Post a Comment