The recently-concluded treaty between Timor-Leste and Australia on
maritime boundaries is a victory for Timor-Leste which will get a larger share
of the revenue from the Greater Sunrise field in the Timor Sea. However, it
will take many years before the field is developed, and the location of the
pipeline remains to be resolved.
Timor-Leste and Australia signed a historic treaty in New York on 6
March 2018, witnessed by the UN Secretary-General, establishing permanent
maritime boundaries between them. The Treaty was the culmination of several
rounds of negotiations since January 2017 between the two countries, and was
facilitated by the Conciliation Commission established under the UN Convention
on the Law of the Sea.
In a joint press release with Australia, Timor-Leste’s main negotiator
in the talks, former Prime Minister Xanana Gusmao, declared that the treaty
“establishes for the first time, a fair border between our two countries, based
on international law”. Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop described the
signing of the treaty as a “milestone” and stated that “It reinforces our
respect for, and the importance of, the international rules-based order in
resolving disputes”.
Transitioning to Fairness
The boundary issue has long been linked by Timor-Leste to the issue of
sovereignty and therefore is hugely symbolic for it. Australia had sought a
boundary that was aligned with its continental shelf, but Timor-Leste’s
position was that that the border should be the median line between it and
Australia. In January 2017, Timor-Leste terminated the 2006 Treaty on Certain
Maritime Arrangements in the Timor Sea (CMATS) with Australia as it was not
happy with this treaty.
It provided that revenues from the Greater Sunrise field would be shared
50:50 between the two countries. The CMATS also put on hold any claim to
sovereign rights and did not establish any local seabed boundary, the final
definition of which was postponed until the treaty’s expiration in 50 years.
Under the new treaty, oil and gas fields currently shared between
Australia and Timor-Leste in the Joint Petroleum Development Area will
transition to Timor-Leste’s exclusive jurisdiction. While they have agreed to
maintain the existing fiscal and regulatory arrangements for the Bayu Undan and
Kitan fields, Timor-Leste will derive 100 percent of future upstream revenue
from these fields. However, as oil resources in these fields are drying up,
this may not amount to much revenue for Timor-Leste.
On the Greater Sunrise field, the Treaty recognises Australia’s and
Timor-Leste’s shared sovereign rights over the resources there. The Treaty
establishes the Greater Sunrise Special Regime to jointly manage and develop
this resource and to share revenue. Australia and Timor-Leste will establish a
Designated Authority and a Governance Board to oversee Greater Sunrise.
Rushing Against Time
The two countries have agreed to share upstream revenue:
– In the ratio of 30 per cent to Australia and 70 per cent to
Timor-Leste in the event that the Greater Sunrise fields are developed by means
of a pipeline to an LNG processing plant in Timor-Leste.
– In the ratio of 20 per cent to Australia and 80 per cent to
Timor-Leste in the event that the Greater Sunrise fields are developed by means
of a pipeline to an LNG processing plant in Australia.
This formula, regardless of what is agreed upon finally, represents an
improvement for Timor-Leste on the 50:50 split outlined in the previous CMATS
Treaty. The reaction to the Treaty in Timor-Leste has been overwhelmingly
positive, while expressing the expectation that the pipeline will bring the gas
to Timor-Leste.
It is uncertain, however, as to how long it will take before oil and gas
resources in the Greater Sunrise field are exploited and provide revenues for
Timor-Leste, regardless of the location of the pipeline. Some experts estimate
that it could take as long as 10-15 years. Time is of the essence for
Timor-Leste as the existing fields are drying up, as revenues in the Petroleum
Fund are diminishing, and as there are few other sources of non-oil income.
Too Costly, Too Risky?
As the critical issue of the location of the pipeline to transport the
gas from Greater Sunrise remains to be resolved, discussions are continuing
between the joint venture (the oil companies) and Timor-Leste. Woodside, the
main partner in the joint venture, has expressed its preference for a pipeline
to Darwin in Australia, as opposed to the option preferred by Timor-Leste,
which is a pipeline from Greater Sunrise to an onshore processing facility in
Timor-Leste (Tase Mane project).
Then Prime Minister Xanana Gusmao explained in a speech in 2013 that the
plan was to develop the south coast as a sub-regional centre for the petroleum
industry, providing direct economic dividends for the country.
The Tase Mane project includes three operational clusters along the
country’s south coast facing the Timor Sea: a supply base in Suai, where
logistics and service works will be undertaken and sourced for the petroleum
industry; a refinery and a petrochemical industry to be established to the
east; and further to the east the government has designated a sizeable area for
the development of LNG projects. This will be the location at which the natural
gas pipeline reaches Timor-Leste.
The joint venture has claimed that the Timorese proposal is too costly,
too risky and not commercially viable. It is uncertain as to what will happen
to the Tase Mane project if there is no agreement on bringing the gas to
Timor-Leste, or if this will be a deal-breaker. Timor-Leste will still get 80%
of the revenues if the pipeline goes to Australia.
Complicated Negotiations with Indonesia?
Another complication for Timor-Leste is that the lateral lines of the
new agreement join with the existing 1972 continental shelf boundary between
Australia and Indonesia. This means that Australia’s and Timor-Leste’s new
boundary arrangements do not affect Indonesia’s rights or change Australia’s
existing boundaries with Indonesia.
Timor-Leste has also yet to reach an agreement on its maritime boundaries
with Indonesia, and although bilateral boundary negotiations were initiated in
late 2015, agreements have yet to be concluded.
Following the signing of the Treaty, Prime Minister Mari Alkatiri was
quoted in the Timor media as stating: “If we do not have agreement with
Indonesia… it has not yet been completed, therefore it is necessary for us to
negotiate with Indonesia.” Hernani Coelho, Timor-Leste’s Petroleum Minister,
said recently that the negotiations with Indonesia on the maritime boundaries could
be “complicated.”
*Viji Menon is a Visiting Senior Fellow
at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang
Technological University (NTU), Singapore. The former Singapore Foreign Service
Officer previously served with the United Nations in Timor-Leste for several
years.
No comments:
Post a Comment