The Air Force F-35 is using “open air” ranges and
computer simulation to practice combat missions against the best Chinese and
Russian-made air-defense technologies – as a way to prepare to enemy threats
anticipated in the mid-2020s and beyond.
The testing
is aimed at addressing the most current air defense system threats such as
Russian-made systems and also focused on potential next-generation or
yet-to-exist threats.
Cutaway View
Air Force officials have explained that, looking back to 2001 when the JSF
threat started, the threats were mostly European centric – Russian made SA-10s
or SA-20s. Now the future threats are looking at both Russian and Chinese-made
and Asian made threats, they said.
“They have got these digital SAMS (surface-to-air-missile-systems) out
there that can change frequencies and they are very agile in how they operate.
being able to replicate that is not easy,” Maj. Gen. Jeffrey Harrigian,
Director of the F-35 Integration Office, told Scout Warrior in an interview.
Surface threats from air defenses is a tough problem because emerging
threats right now can see aircraft hundreds of miles away, service officials
explained.
Furthermore, emerging and future Integrated Air Defense Systems use
faster computer processors, are better networked to one-another and detect on a
wider range of frequencies. These attributes, coupled with an ability to detect
aircraft at further distances, make air defenses increasingly able to at times
detect even stealth aircraft, in some instances, with surveillance radar.
(This piece first appeared in Scout Warrior here)
While the Air Force aims to prepare for the unlikely contingency of a
potential engagement with near-peer rivals such as Russia or China, Harrigian
explained that there is much more concern about having to confront an adversary
which has purchased air-defense technology from the Russians or Chinese.
Harrigian emphasized that, while there is no particular conflict expected with
any given specific country, the service wants to be ready for any contingency.
Harrigian explained that the F-35 is engineered with what developers
call “open architecture,” meaning it is designed to quickly integrate new
weapons, software and avionics technology as new threats emerge.
“One of the key reasons we bought this airplane is because the threats
continue to evolve - we have to be survivable in this threat environment that
has continued to develop capabilities where they can deny us access to specific
objectives that we may want to achieve. This airplane gives us the ability to
penetrate, deliver weapons and then share that information across the formation
that it is operating in,” Harrigian explained.
While training against the best emerging threats in what Harrigian
called “open air” ranges looks to test the F-35 against the best current and
future air defenses – there is still much more work to be done when it comes to
anticipating high-end, high-tech fast developing future threats. This is where
modeling and simulation play a huge part in threat preparation, he added.
“The place where we have to have the most agility is really in the
modeling and simulation environment - If you think about our open air ranges,
we try to build these ranges that have this threats that we expect to be
fighting. Given the pace at which the enemy is developing these threats - it
becomes very difficult for us to go out and develop these threats,” Harrigan
explained.
The Air Force plans to bring a representation of next-generation threats
and weapons to its first weapons school class in 2018.
In a simulated environment, F-22s from Langley AFB in Virginia could
train for combat scenarios with an F-35 at Nellis AFB, Nevada, he said.
The JSF’s Active Electronically Scanned Arrays, or AESA’s, the aircraft
is able to provide a synthetic aperture rendering of air and ground pictures.
The AESA also brings the F-35 electronic warfare capabilities, Harrigian
said.
Part of the idea with F-35 modernization is to engineered systems on the
aircraft which can be upgraded with new software as threats change.
Technologies such as the AESA radar, electronic attack and protection and some
of the computing processing power on the airplane, can be updated to keep pace
with evolving threats, Harrigian said.
Engineered to travel at speeds greater than 1,100 miles per hour and
able to reach Mach 1.6, the JSF is said to be just as fast and maneuverable at
an F-15 or F-16 and bring and a whole range of additional functions and
abilities.
Overall, the Air Force plans to buy 1,763 JSF F-35A multi-role fighters,
a number which will ultimately comprise a very large percentage of the
service’s fleet of roughly 2,000 fighter jets. So far, at least 83 F-35As
are operational for the Air Force.
4th Software
Drop:
Many of the JSF’s combat capabilities are woven into developmental
software increments or “drops,” each designed to advance the platforms
technical abilities. There are more than 10 million individual lines of code in
the JSF system.
While the Air Force plans to declare its F-345s operational with the
most advanced software drop, called 3F, the service is already working on a 4th
drop to be ready by 2020 or 2021. Following this initial drop, the aircraft
will incorporate new software drops in two year increments in order to stay
ahead of the threat.
The first portion of Block IV software funding, roughly $12 million,
arrived in the 2014 budget, Air Force officials said.
Block IV will include some unique partner weapons including British
weapons, Turkish weapons and some of the other European country weapons that
they want to get on their own plane, service officials explained.
Block IV will also increase the weapons envelope for the U.S. variant of
the fighter jet. A big part of the developmental calculus for Block 4 is
to work on the kinds of enemy air defense systems and weaponry the aircraft may
face from the 2020’s through the 2040’s and beyond.
In terms of weapons, Block IV will eventually enable the F-35 to fire
cutting edge weapons systems such as the Small Diameter Bomb II and GBU-54 –
both air dropped bombs able to destroy targets on the move.
The Small Diameter Bomb II uses a technology called a “tri-mode” seeker,
drawing from infrared, millimeter wave and laser-guidance. The combination of
these sensors allows the weapon to track and eliminate moving targets in all
kinds of weather conditions.
These emerging 4th software drop will build upon prior iterations of the
software for the aircraft.
Block 2B builds upon the enhanced simulated weapons, data link
capabilities and early fused sensor integration of the earlier Block 2A
software drop. Block 2B will enable the JSF to provide basic close air support
and fire an AMRAAM (Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile), JDAM (Joint
Direct Attack Munition) or GBU-12 (laser-guided aerial bomb) JSF program
officials said.
Following Block 2B, Block 3i increases the combat capability even
further and Block 3F will bring a vastly increased ability to suppress enemy
air defenses.
Block 3F will increase the weapons delivery capacity of the JSF as well,
giving it the ability to drop a Small Diameter Bomb, 500-pound JDAM and AIM 9X
short-range air-to-air missile, service officials explained.
The AIM 9X is an Air Force and Navy heat-seeking infrared missile.
In fact, the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter fired an AIM-9X Sidewinder
infrared-guided air-to-air missile for the first time recently over a Pacific
Sea Test Range, Pentagon officials said.
The F-35 took off from Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., and launched the
missile at 6,000 feet, an Air Force statement said.
Designed as part of the developmental trajectory for the emerging F-35,
the test-firing facilities further development of an ability to fire the weapon
“off-boresight,” described as an ability to target and destroy air to air
targets that are not in front of the aircraft with a direct or immediate line
of sight, Pentagon officials explained.
The AIM-9X, he described, incorporates an agile thrust vector controlled
airframe and the missile’s high off-boresight capability can be used with an
advanced helmet (or a helmet-mounted sight) for a wider attack envelope.
F-35 25mm
Gun:
Last Fall, the Pentagon’s F-35 Joint Strike Fighter recently completed
the first aerial test of its 25mm Gatling gun embedded into the left wing of
the aircraft, officials said.
The test took place Oct. 30, 2015, in California, Pentagon officials
described.
“This milestone was the first in
a series of test flights to functionally evaluate the in-flight operation of
the F-35A’s internal 25mm gun throughout its employment envelope,” a Pentagon
statement said several months ago.
The Gatling gun will bring a substantial technology to the multi-role
fighter platform, as it will better enable the aircraft to perform air-to-air
attacks and close-air support missions to troops on the ground.
Called the Gun Airborne Unit, or GAU-22/A, the weapon is engineered into
the aircraft in such a manner as to maintain the platform’s stealth
configuration.
The four-barrel 25mm gun is designed for rapid fire in order to quickly
blanket an enemy with gunfire and destroy targets quickly. The weapon is able
to fire 3,300 rounds per minute, according to a statement from General
Dynamics.
“Three bursts of one 30 rounds and two 60 rounds each were fired from
the aircraft’s four-barrel, 25-millimeter Gatling gun. In integrating the
weapon into the stealthy F 35Aairframe, the gun must be kept hidden behind
closed doors to reduce its radar cross section until the trigger is pulled,” a
statement from the Pentagon’s Joint Strike Fighter said.
The first phase of test execution consisted of 13 ground gunfire events
over the course of three months to verify the integration of the gun into the
F-35A, the JSF office said.
“Once verified, the team was cleared to begin this second phase of
testing, with the goal of evaluating the gun’s performance and integration with
the airframe during airborne gunfire in various flight conditions and aircraft
configurations,” the statement added.
The new gun will also be integrated with the F-35’s software so as to
enable the pilot to see and destroy targets using a helmet-mounted display.
The gun is slated to be operational by 2017.
Kris Osborn became the Managing Editor of Scout Warrior in
August of 2015. His role with Scout.com includes managing content on the Scout
Warrior site and generating independently sourced original material. Scout
Warrior is aimed at providing engaging, substantial military-specific content
covering a range of key areas such as weapons, emerging or next-generation
technologies and issues of relevance to the military. Just prior to coming to
Scout Warrior, Osborn served as an Associate Editor at the Military.com.
This story originally appeared in Scout Warrior.
No comments:
Post a Comment