Anyone who has been watching the United States try
to pull off its much discussed “pivot”
or “rebalance” to Asia knows one thing: The challenges of the
day, from Russian moves in Eastern Europe and Syria to the threat of ISIS—or
even just the steady stream of non-Asia-Pacific problems—always seem to get in
the way. However, we must give President Obama credit where credit is due. U.S.
relations with India, which shares a common challenge with America in a rising
China, have warmed considerably. While certainly not a full-blown alliance,
relations have grown to such an extent that U.S. defense officials seem willing
to share some of their most prized military technologies with the rising South
Asian powerhouse. Indeed, the United States seems ready to share the very
symbol of American power projection: the mighty aircraft carrier.
A report from Reuters notes that
Washington and New Delhi are discussing options for the joint development of an
aircraft carrier for India. In a recent visit to India, Chief of U.S. Naval
Operations, John Richardson, remarked that “we are making very good progress, I
am very pleased with the progress to date and optimistic we can do more in the
future. That's on a very solid track.”
Richardson, according to the Reuters report, revealed that one of
the crown jewels of American carrier technology—highly coveted electromagnetic
launch technology that allows heavier planes to take off from the carrier
flight deck—was part of the talks. Richardson offered that “all of those things
are on the table, there are possibilities, it’s a matter of pacing, it's very
new technology for us."
Considering how difficult it is to build an aircraft carrier—for example, China began in-depth, first-hand analysis of
scraped aircraft carriers it purchased back in 1985, taking
until 2012 to commission a small rebuilt ex-Soviet carrier—this is nothing
short of a coup for India. Up until this point, New Delhi’s best options were, shall
we say, less than desirable Russian technology. As frequent National
Interest contributor Kyle Mizokami points out:
“In the early 2000s, India faced a dilemma. The Indian navy’s only
carrier INS Viraat was set to retire in 2007. . . India’s options were limited.
The only countries building carriers at the time—the United States, France and
Italy—were building ships too big for India’s checkbook. In 2004, India and
Russia struck a deal in which India would receive Admiral Gorshkov. The ship
herself would be free, but India would pay $974 million dollars to Russia to
upgrade her.
“It was an ambitious project. At 44,500 tons, Admiral Gorshkov was a
huge ship. Already more than a decade old, she had spent eight years
languishing in mothballs. Indifference and Russia’s harsh winters are unkind to
idle ships.”
From here, well, things took an interesting turn:
“In 2007, just a year before delivery, it became clear that Russia’s
Sevmash shipyard couldn’t meet the ambitious deadline. Even worse, the yard
demanded more than twice as much money—$2.9 billion in total—to
complete the job.
“The cost of sea trials alone,
originally $27 million, ballooned to a fantastic $550 million.
“A year later, with the project still in disarray, Sevmash estimated the
carrier to be only 49-percent complete. Even more galling, one Sevmash
executive suggested that India should pay an additional $2 billion, citing a
“market price” of a brand-new carrier at “between $3 billion and $4 billion.”
And, perhaps, worse still:
“The ship’s boilers, which provide Vikramaditya [the Indian rechristened
for Admiral Gorshkov] with power and propulsion, are a long-term concern. All
eight boilers are new. But yard workers discovered defects in them. During her
trip from Russia to India, the flattop suffered a boiler breakdown, which Sevmash chalked up to
poor-quality Chinese firebricks.”
Clearly India, now able to ‘pivot’ away from Russia’s carrier problems,
stands to benefit dramatically in this new partnership with America.
Reuters also noted that a joint working group is set to meet in New Delhi in the
coming weeks as part of a sustained effort to establish strong cooperation on
the design, development and production of a proposed Indian carrier. My
question is this: Would America also be willing to sell to its new South Asian
partner the carrier-based version of the F-35? Considering rumors a
few years back concerning a possible F-35 purchase by New Delhi,
you have to wonder. If China keeps pushing its weight around in the wider
Indo-Pacific region, one can’t dismiss how far this partnership could really
go.
Harry Kazianis is
presently serves as Senior Fellow (non-resident) for Defense Policy at the Center for the National Interest as well
as a Fellow for National Security Affairs at
The Potomac Foundation.
No comments:
Post a Comment