Indonesia made a big and
highly significant decision to award China rather than Japan the
Jakarta–Bandung high-speed rail project, which is expected to start
construction in early 2016. Jakarta had a dilemma: should it choose between a
trusted old friend (Japan) or a new emerging power (China)?
Despite an attractive
proposition from Japan, China eventually secured the project with terms that
Jakarta found hard to refuse. The clincher was China’s willingness to forego a
sovereign guarantee by the Indonesian government.
Japan criticised China’s
proposal as unrealistic. It lacked government funding and is likely to end up
making losses as it has to deal with a complex and corrupt Indonesian
bureaucracy. But China showed that it will not hesitate to use its greatest
weapon to get what it wants: money and flexibility to adapt to the needs of the
local government.
Having completed a
feasibility study that took 10 years and cost approximately US$3 million, Japan
was initially the frontrunner for the Jakarta–Bandung high-speed railway
project. As Indonesia’s second largest investor, Tokyo had also been enjoying
strong ties with Jakarta. This is especially so considering Japan’s strong
commitment to realising its investments in Indonesia.
Japan had also presented the
best feasible offer, combining high quality products with a cheap bilateral
loan for its financing — Indonesia would have to pay only 0.1 per cent
interest. Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe also attempted to offer a
last-minute deal by lessening the quantum of the Indonesian sovereign
guarantee, shortening the completion time to about five years, including a
transfer of knowledge deal and promising to expand maritime cooperation with
Indonesia.
Beijing had offered Jakarta
US$5.27 billion, compared to Tokyo’s US$4.4 billion, without a government
guarantee and purely as a business-to-business transaction. This offer was
followed by other deals such as capacity building and developing local
manufacturing industries that would open job opportunities for approximately
40,000 workers.
This means that the
Indonesian government will enjoy the results while China does all the heavy
lifting. China also promised to complete the project by the 2019 national
election. That would be a plus for Indonesian President Joko ‘Jokowi’ Widodo,
who will likely run for a second term. The three-year timeframe is of course
more appealing for Jokowi as it would be an enormous
political boost for him.
Indonesia’s decision aroused
deep disappointment in Japan. Japanese Transportation Minister Akihiro Ota has
said that Japan would re-evaluate its overall investment in Indonesia. Although
Indonesia has offered Japan a consolation prize through other projects, the
decision showed that China’s approach toward developing countries in economic
cooperation and investment could prove irresistible.
China’s Indonesia policy is
a reflection of its eagerness to realise its One Belt One Road strategy.
The policies were attempts by China to open up ‘escape routes’ for itself from
being cornered in the Pacific. China views the United States as creating a
‘strategic ring of encirclement’ through its rebalance to the Western Pacific
strategy. Many US allies in the Pacific such as Japan, South Korea, the
Philippines and Australia have also attempted to shape a perception that
China’s rise is a looming threat and would destabilise the region.
But this view may not
necessarily be shared by countries in Southeast Asia and Central Asia.
Southeast Asian countries exercise caution towards China’s rise. But they will
still be open toward Beijing’s attempts to increase its foothold in the region as long as it provides a certain
amount of benefits.
Tokyo has been trying to
counterbalance Beijing’s attempts to enhance and deepen its influence in the
Asia Pacific. In May 2015, Abe announced his plan to deepen ties with Southeast
Asian countries via increased financing of infrastructure projects over five
years. Japan has also deepened its maritime ties with the Philippines and
Vietnam — which both oppose China’s growing assertiveness in the South China
Sea territorial disputes. Japan does not want to accept Chinese primacy and is
interested in preserving the political and strategic independence of countries
in Southeast Asia by providing an alternative to China.
One of the major obstacles
that China faces is the lack of confidence in the region in China’s commitment
and in the quality of its products. But if China is successful in this high
speed rail project, it would open up opportunities for other projects in
Indonesia and other countries in Southeast Asia.
China’s ability to be
flexible to accommodate the needs of a government in power has also become its
strongest appeal. But while China’s can-do attitude without conditionalities
has positioned it favourably, much now depends on whether Beijing can live up
to Japan’s reputation for quality and reliability.
Emirza Adi Syailendra is
a Research Analyst with the Indonesia Programme at the S. Rajaratnam of
International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
No comments:
Post a Comment