Beijing is working on a host of
different weapon systems designed to destroy or disable U.S. satellites in
space. A new report by the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission
offers insights into China’s burgeoning space weapons program designed to
attack U.S. satellites and undermine American C5ISR capabilities in the event
of a conflict.
The Washington Times obtained a copy of the report, which will be
published next month. “China is pursuing a broad and robust array of
counterspace capabilities, which includes direct-ascent anti-satellite
missiles, co-orbital anti-satellite systems, computer network operations,
ground-based satellite jammers and directed energy weapons,” the report reads.
The People’s Republic’s counterspace capabilities play
a pivotal role in the Chinese military’s overall anti-access/area denial
(A2/AD) doctrine to counter U.S. conventional superiority based on network
centric warfare. The 2014 iteration of the U.S.-China Economic and Security
Review Commission report quotes a Chinese
military analyst, who notes that the development long-range precision strike
weapons “cannot be separated from space power.”
The 2015 report reiterates this line of thinking:
The PLA assesses U.S. satellites are critical to the
United States’ ability to sustain combat operations globally. PLA analysis of
U.S. military operations states that “destroying or capturing satellites and
other sensors will deprive an opponent of initiative on the battlefield and
[make it difficult] for them to bring their precision-guided weapons into full
play.”
The report further points out that China is continuing
to develop and test the
ground-based, medium-range SC-19 ballistic missile, as well as the Dong Neng-2
anti-satellite missile, a high-earth orbit interceptor. The Dong Neng-2
could enter service within the next five to ten years.
China destroyed a defunct weather satellite with a
missile in 2007. In addition, Beijing tested a missile-fired anti-satellite
kill vehicle in the summer of 2014, disguising it as a ballistic missile
defense test. “China’s nuclear arsenal also provides an inherent anti-satellite
capability,” the report states.
China is also developing a number of different
space-based weapons. “These systems consist of a satellite armed with a weapon
such as an explosive charge, fragmentation device, kinetic energy weapon,
laser, radio frequency weapon, jammer or robotic arm,” according to the study.
Beijing, in the event of war, will furthermore deploy
its cyber warriors and cyber weapons to disable U.S. communications in space by
attempting “to conduct computer network attacks against U.S. satellites and
ground-based facilities that interact with U.S. satellites,” the study says.
Should such an attack be successful it could fundamentally undermine U.S.
ability to maintain information superiority in a conflict:
For example, access to a satellite’s controls could
allow an attacker to damage or destroy the satellite; deny, degrade, or
manipulate its transmissions; or access its capabilities or the information,
such as imagery, that can be gained through its sensors.
Chinese analysts believe that the United States relies
upon satellites for 70 to 80 percent of its intelligence collection and 80
percent of its communication. It is thus easy to see why China invests heavily
into developing anti-satellite capabilities.
As I reported before (See: “Is the Pentagon Losing the Arms
Race in Space?”), U.S. officials are especially concerned about
threats to U.S. Advanced Extremely High
Frequency (AEHF) satellites.
However, as The Diplomat contributor Jaganath
Sankaran emphasized in 2014,”[T]he benefits from an ASAT [anti-satellite]
attack are limited and would not confer decisive military advantage in every
plausible conflict.”
“The substantial range of orbital altitude — 1,000
kilometers to 36,000 kilometers — from which satellites operate poses a
challenge to China’s ability to attack U.S. military satellites (…) Unlike the
U.S., China has a very limited satellite tracking capability, most of which are
based in its territory and possibly a few ships,” he explains.
Furthermore he stresses that “the presence of
alternate platforms and built-in redundancies substantially limit the
advantages that China can obtain from anti-satellite operation against the
U.S.”By Franz-Stefan Gady
No comments:
Post a Comment