A Sumatran rhino and her calf at Way Kambas National Park in Lampung. (EPA
Photo/Hadi Wijoyo)
Indonesia
is the second-most important country in the world for conservation. It has more
species than pretty much anywhere else in the world, but threats are high.
Compared to many other countries things are still pretty good here. In fact,
and despite the many depressing conservation stories, Indonesia remains the
crown jewel of Southeast Asian conservation. Still, Indonesia is short on local
biodiversity experts, which makes it so much harder to effectively deal with
biodiversity conservation challenges.
Last week, we attended the IUCN Leaders
meeting in Abu Dhabi. The International Union for Conservation of Nature
represents the largest conservation network of volunteers. These people
coordinate species specialist groups or topical task forces, and provide the
scientific backing needed for effective conservation and environmental
management.
Among the approximately 400 IUCN leaders
gathered in Abu Dhabi, two represented Indonesia. Mirza is a member of the IUCN
Steering Committee and Erik chairs the Wild Pig Specialist Group, and helps out
in other groups for primates, birds and also oil palm. Two out of 400 is 0.5 percent,
and only one of us two is properly Indonesian.
Half a percent is pretty dismal
considering how important Indonesia is globally. Based on the importance of the
country for global conservation, some 10 percent or 15 percent of the global
experts should really be Indonesian, not 0.5.
The above figures are for senior managers
in the IUCN, but how do the numbers stack up for ordinary IUCN members? In
2013, the total number of IUCN Species Survival Commission members around
the world was 8,050, with the highest number originating from the United
States (1,633), followed by the United Kingdom (630), Australia (328) and
India (327).
Of the two top mega-diverse countries in
the world, the membership counts are 240 for Brazil and 109 for Indonesia. 109
out of a total 8,050 is just over 1 percent, reflecting the representation of
Indonesian conservation leaders in Abu Dhabi.
Why is Indonesia so marginally
represented? The relatively low quality of local conservation science is one
factor, ability to speak and write English another one. But still there are a
great number of Indonesians with considerable knowledge of the country’s
wildlife and a major commitment to saving it. Why are these people not joining
international organizations to share their knowledge and insights? Surely, a
local expert from Papua will know much better how to save an endemic Papuan
frog than someone based in an American or UK institution.
There are a few ways for increasing
Indonesian participation in international conservation planning and science.
Besides improving in-country education and strengthening local science, which
requires long-term investment, Indonesian experts could be more pro-active in
trying to join species specialist groups and task forces.
For example, the Wild Pig Specialist Group
that Erik chairs has six Indonesia-based members (from a total of 68), but five
are of non-Indonesian nationality. There are eight different wild pig species
in Indonesia and the group is in desperate need for more local expertise,
especially from Sulawesi, Maluku and Java. Anyone with an interest in
these species and willingness to contribute to their conservation could join
and help us in our work. This can significantly increase your chances to
attract some funding for conservation work.
There are many other specialist groups and task
forces and if you are interested, experienced, and willing to
contribute voluntary time, contact the groups’ chairs and offer your expertise.
It is a great way to work with international experts and learn from them. More
importantly, it will strengthen Indonesia’s ability to address its many
conservation problems.
There are presently 135 specialist groups
and task forces, but Indonesians are only active in 28 of them, mostly in fauna
groups. Indonesian scientists might argue that their expertise does not fit any
of the specialist group’s requirements. But they can, in fact, propose to
develop their own regional specialist group, as long as the leadership is
clear, like local experts have done for the Madagascar Plant Specialist Group,
Brazil Plant Red List Authority, and Asian Elephant Specialist Group.
Why not create the Indonesian Plant
Specialist Group? There are about 28,000 species of flowering plants in
Indonesia, and it seems daft not to have a group that deals with the
conservation of these.
At the moment, Indonesia is in the top
three of the global list of the most threatened species. Its lands and seas
contain more than 1,300 species that require immediate conservation intervention
to prevent their extinction. It would be fair to say that for each of these
species at least one local expert is needed who can push for effective action
to maintain viable populations.
We call on Indonesian experts to join the
IUCN specialist groups or task forces. Note that because the number of people
who want to become members can be high, especially in some popular specialist
groups, selection criteria apply.
Once you are in, a range of training
opportunities exist, such as the online IUCN Red list Training. Having more
Indonesian experts who understand extinction processes and can translate that
into meaningful conservation management guidance, would strengthen the voice of
local conservation science. This would ultimately affect conservation
decision-making and policy by the authorities.
Positive conservation outcomes in
Indonesia are possible. This year, the IUCN awarded the Sir Peter Scott Award,
their highest award, to Widodo Ramono for his life-long dedication to
Indonesian conservation and the conservation of Javan and Sumatran rhinoceros
in particular. If it hadn't been for Widodo the Javan rhino would likely no
longer exist.
So, come on, you Indonesian conservation
experts. Who dares to follow the footsteps of Widodo and become the next
Indonesian conservation leader?
Erik Meijaard and Mirza Kusrini are
affiliated with Borneo Futures and the Bogor Agricultural University (IPB),
respectively.
No comments:
Post a Comment