Milestone in Prime Minister Shinzo
Abe's push to loosen the limits of the pacifist constitution on the military.
Abe says the shift,
the biggest change in Japan's defence policy since the creation of its post-war
military in 1954, is vital to meet new challenges such as from a rising China.
But the legislation
has triggered massive protests from ordinary citizens and others who say it
violates the pacifist constitution and could ensnare Japan in U.S.-led
conflicts after 70 years of post-war peace. Abe's ratings have also taken a
hit.
The legislation
"is necessary to protect the people's lives and peaceful way of living and
is for the purpose of preventing wars," Abe told reporters after the bills
were approved by the upper house. "I want to keep explaining the laws
tenaciously and courteously."
Japan's ally the
United States has welcomed the changes but China, where bitter memories of
Japan's wartime aggression run deep, has repeatedly expressed concern about the
legislation.
"Recently we
have noticed that voices in Japan opposing the bill have become louder by the
day," Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Hong Lei told a regular news
briefing on Friday.
"We demand that
Japan earnestly listen to these just voices domestically and internationally,
learn the lessons of history, uphold the path of peaceful development, speak and
act cautiously in security and military matters and take actual steps to
maintain regional peace and stability," Hong added.
The bills, already
approved by parliament's lower house, were voted into law by the upper chamber
in the early hours of Saturday despite opposition parties' efforts to block a
vote by submitting censure motions and a no-confidence motion against Abe's
cabinet in the lower house. All were defeated.
A key feature of the
laws is an end to a long-standing ban on exercising the right of collective
self-defense, or defending the United States or another friendly country that
comes under attack, in cases where Japan faces a "threat to its
survival".
Thousands of
demonstrators have rallied near parliament every day this week, chanting
"Scrap the war bills" and "Abe resign". Large crowds were
still protesting into the early hours of Saturday.
The protests have
called to mind those that forced Abe's grandfather, Nobusuke Kishi, to resign
55 years ago after forcing a U.S.-Japan security treaty through parliament.
The revisions also
expand the scope for logistics support for the militaries of the United States
and other countries, and for participation in peace keeping.
The changes still
leave Japan constrained in overseas military operations by legal limits and a
deeply rooted public anti-war mindset.
"Even if the
constitution is revised, among the Japanese people no-one is thinking of going
to foreign lands for the purpose of exercising force," former defence
minister Itsunori Onodera told Reuters in an interview earlier this week.
"I think Japan will maintain that stance from now on as well."
Critics,
however, say the changes make a mockery of the pacifist constitution and
deplore what they see as Abe's authoritarian mode of pushing for enactment of
the bills.
Opposition to the
legislation brought together both liberals keen to preserve Japan's pacifist
principles and conservative critics of what they consider Abe's authoritarian
tactics.
"The content,
process and doctrine of the security bills ... risk reversing the path we have
walked for the past 70 years as a country of peace and democracy," Yukio
Edano, secretary-general of the opposition Democratic Party, told parliament's
lower house ahead of the no-confidence vote against Abe.
Abe won a second
three-year term as ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) chief earlier this
month and faces no immediate danger of being unseated, but voter distaste for
the new laws could hurt the ruling bloc in an election next year.
"The people’s
revolt will continue toward the next election one way or another," said
Keio University professor Yoshihide Soeya.
(Reuters: Additional
reporting by Ben Blanchard in Beijing and Kiyoshi Takenaka in Tokyo.; Editing by Paul Tait and Simon Cameron-Moore)
No comments:
Post a Comment