Recent reports of PLAN naval movements have many analysts worried.
During a press conference on January 29, a spokesperson of the Chinese
Ministry of National Defense (MND), announced that China
will step up its deployment of a range of warships in the Indian Ocean. IHS Jane’s reports
that Senior Colonel Yang Yujun, after being asked a question on PLAN submarine movements
in the Indian Ocean, tried to downplay Chinese naval activities in the region,
characterizing them as “normal” and emphasizing that “there is no need to read
too much into them.”
“[T]he
Chinese military has sent various kinds of naval ships to the Gulf of Aden and
the waters off the Somali coast to conduct escort missions since 2008. And in
the process, we have notified relevant countries of the escort missions of the
PLA naval ships, including the PLA naval submarines,” Yang said in his remarks.
“In the future, the Chinese military will send different kinds of naval ships
to take part in the naval escort missions in accordance with the situation and
the requirement to fulfill the task.”
The
presence of Chinese submarine forces in the ocean has the other great regional
power, India, worried. Indian
military officers have stated that the deployment of nuclear subs would cross a
redline and trigger a
naval arms race.
As my
colleague Shannon Tiezzi pointed out this
morning, many Indian and Western analysts believe that China is pursuing a
clear-cut long-term naval strategy to dominate the Indian Ocean. In 2005, the
U.S. consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton came up with the “string of pearls” hypothesis,
which posits that China will try to expand its naval presence by building
civilian maritime infrastructure along the Indian Ocean periphery. Those ports
in turn could be put to dual use eventually and serve as naval ports for ships
of the PLAN.
Chinese
investment in the port of Gwadar is often cited as the prime example, as are
recent investments in port facilities in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and
Myanmar. China tried to alleviate Indian and Western fears by re-branding
its initiative, calling it a
“Maritime Silk Road.” However, according to experts, the strategy remains
essentially the same and includes infrastructure
projects, special economic zones, and a system of linked ports.
In an
analysis of the situation, Prem Mahadevan notes that “in the
medium-term, it is unlikely that many IOR [Indian Ocean Region] states would
acquiesce to a creeping militarization of their territorial waters by
permitting a permanent Chinese naval presence.” In the long-term, however, he
notes that many governments in the region may ultimately consent to an
increased Chinese naval presence in their waters in order not to jeopardize
trade deals with Beijing.
Looking
at the situation from a purely military perspective, it is evident that China,
ever since 2008, has begun expanding its South Sea Fleet. Mahadevan
elaborates that China may already be in the process of creating a fourth fleet,
based at Hainan Island and consisting of two carrier battle groups, which could
be operational by 2020. Since these carrier battle groups would be extremely
vulnerable to U.S. naval superiority in the Western Pacific, their logical
field of operation would be the Indian Ocean, where they would exercise more of
a psychological impact. Yet even in peacetime, the presence of these
groups in region will increase the change of incidences at sea.
Mahadevan
concludes, “The IOR plays an integral part in China’s narrative of a ‘peaceful
rise.’” However, the recent PLAN incursions may trigger India (and other Indian
Ocean nations) to question this narrative more thoroughly. The Diplomat
No comments:
Post a Comment