Hong
Kong chief executive CY Leung faces questions over secret $7m payout from
Australian firm
CY Leung's undisclosed millions
The man whose face has
been the target for Hong Kong student protesters, secretly pocketed millions in
fees from an Australian company. So, who is China's chief executive CY Leung?
Hong Kong's embattled
chief executive, CY Leung, has pocketed millions in secret fees from a listed
Australian company in return for supporting its Asian business ambitions, a
Fairfax Media investigation can reveal.
The arrangement is
outlined in a secret contract dated December 2, 2011, before he was
elected chief executive, in which Australian engineering company UGL
agreed to pay the Beijing-backed politician £4 million (more than $A7 million).
The payments were
made in two instalments, in 2012 and 2013, after he became Hong Kong's
top official.
The payments relate
to a deal in which UGL bought an insolvent 200-year old British property
services firm he was associated with called DTZ Holdings, whose prospects
depended on Mr Leung's network of managers and clients in Hong Kong and
mainland China.
Mr Leung, who is
currently battling unprecedented pro-democracy protests, strenuously defended
his judgment to not declare the payments on his register of personal
interests, when Fairfax brought them to his attention.
The sale left Mr
Leung with a secretive financial windfall – including an additional guarantee
that UGL would pay to him an outstanding £1.5 million bonus owed by the
insolvent firm – but left DTZ's other shareholders and unsecured creditors with
nothing, wiping out investments and debts worth tens of millions of dollars.
Mr Leung's side deal
equated to more than 5 per cent of the purchase price.
A statement from his
office said the payments related to past, not future, service and they were
agreed at a time when he held no official position and before he was elected
chief executive.
"The payments
therefore arise from Mr Leung's resignation from DTZ, not any future service to
be provided by him," said Mr Leung's spokesman, Michael Yu.
"Both the
resignation from DTZ and conclusion of the agreement with UGL took place before
Mr Leung was elected as the chief executive," he said. "There is no
requirement under our current systems of declaration for Mr Leung to declare
the above."
Mr Leung's statement
added that he had stepped down as a member of Hong Kong's executive council on
October 3, 2011, prior to DTZ's sale to UGL, Mr Leung was a director of DTZ and
chairman of its Asia-Pacific operations when he and fellow board members
decided to appoint administrators to sell the company's assets to UGL for £76 million.
He announced his resignation from DTZ on November 24, formally confirmed his candidature for the role of Hong Kong chief executive on November 27 and signed the lucrative contract on December 2, 2011.
Mr Leung's
resignation took effect on December 4, 2011, the day that UGL acquired DTZ.
The arrangement
raises transparency questions for Mr Leung and also the Australian purchasing
company, which is in the process of selling the DTZ business on to a US private
equity firm, TPG.
The letter from
Leupen to CY Leung.
DTZ's administrators,
Ernst & Young, and its chairman at the time of its sale to UGL, Tim
Melville Ross, said they were not aware of the Hong Kong politician's agreement
with the Australian company.
The terms are set out
under a cover letter from UGL's chief executive, Richard Leupen.
"It has been a
pleasure getting to know you during this time and I look forward to continuing
our relationship into the future," wrote Mr Leupen. "Your
achievements in Hong Kong and China have been outstanding."
An attached schedule
shows Mr Leung agreed to ensure that nominated members of his Asian management
team remained in place and also that he would "provide such assistance in
the promotion of the UGL Group and the DTZ group as UGL may reasonably
require".
He also agreed to not
to compete with UGL and to act as "a referee and advisor from time to
time", adding in a handwritten note that his support was on the condition
it "does not create any conflict of interest".
The wording appears
to clash with Mr Leung's statement that the payments only related to past
dealings.
The terms also
contrast with DTZ's 2011 annual report, which states that Mr Leung was not to
receive any payments beyond those statutorily required if his employment ceased
due to a change of ownership.
In detailed answers
to questions, the Australian company UGL underscored Mr Leung's immense
importance to the Chinese operations of the company they were purchasing.
Crucially, UGL said
the payment agreement was made not in hope of soliciting favours for the
business but out of fear that he could destroy it.
"It was entered
into solely to ensure CY Leung did not move to a competitor or set up or
promote any business in competition with DTZ, or poach any people from DTZ, and
hence to ensure the business retained its value after the UGL
acquisition," said UGL.
"The China/HK
business was critical to UGL's assessment of DTZ's value at the time of the
acquisition," it said.
"It is standard
business practice to pay for such undertakings, as you are requiring the
individual to take on obligations and to forgo future opportunities."
UGL said the
documentation did not include a clause to invalidate Mr Leung's payment in the
event that he succeeded in his bid for office because management did not think
that he would win.
"At the time of
the negotiations, media coverage suggested that other candidates were favoured
to be elected, so the possibility of CY Leung securing office was not the focus
of UGL's negotiations," said UGL.
Leading Australian
corporate integrity expert Neville Tiffen said the lack of transparency around
the payments raised serious probity questions.
These questions
extend to whether Mr Leung or UGL disclosed the proposed payments to DTZ's UK
administrators or directors at the time the administrators and DTZ board agreed
to the beleaguered company's rapid sale.
Such questions have
come at an awkward time for Mr Leung, who is battling to assuage tens of
thousands of students and supporters who have paralysed much of the city's
central business district over the past ten days, calling for his
resignation.
The protesters accuse
Mr Leung of working for Beijing, at the expense of Hong Kong's promised
democracy and autonomy, and failing to defend the institutions that underpin
one of the world's most vibrant and successful cities.
Both sides have
retreated from earlier positions and protest numbers have thinned ahead of
anticipated negotiations.
UGL, the Australian
firm, conceded that Mr Leung's multimillion-dollar payment deal was not
disclosed in any public document but said there was no duty otherwise.
It said the main
creditor, Royal Bank of Scotland, was aware of the payment and deducted the
amount from the DTZ purchase price.
"This was a
matter for the seller, as it was a necessary payment for the protection of the
value of the business," said UGL. "The acquisition would not have
proceeded if this value was not protected and assured."
DTZ's administrator,
Ernst and Young, said in a statement it did not know about the
arrangement.
"The
Administrators have no detailed knowledge of any specific arrangements made
between UGL and any other party."
The former chairman
of DTZ, Tim Melville Ross, also said he was unaware of the deal between Mr
Leung and UGL..
"If there
were any discussions between Mr Leung and UGL, these were quite separate from
the negotiations between DTZ and UGL," he said.
Corporate integrity
expert and former head of global compliance for Rio Tinto, Neville Tiffen,
examined the secret documents for Fairfax Media.
Mr Tiffen said:
"Whenever you are offering financial benefits to public officials or
directors of a company, dealings must be transparent. Without transparency, people's
conduct is brought into question."
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/business/world-business/hong-kong-chief-executive-cy-leung-faces-questions-over-secret-7m-payout-from-australian-firm-20141008-1134yv.html#ixzz3FaiUOZ5O
No comments:
Post a Comment