There’s a heavy sigh from viewers in Asia as Canberra loses an important
plank in its soft power.
When the final whistle blew on Hawthorn’s thumping victory over the
Sydney Swans in this year’s Aussie Rules grand final it also sounded the death
knell for Australia Network (AN), the television channel that delivered
Australian programs across much of Asia and beyond.
As anticipated, the network was shut down shortly after the final due to
government spending cuts that were delivered by the conservative Liberal Party
after its victory at last year’s election.
However, the $223 million bill over 10 years was considered small by
many who felt the network’s ability to show-off the best of Australia to a
potential audience reach of billions of people was worth the money.
Lindsay
Murdoch, Southeast Asian Correspondent for The Age and The Sydney
Morning Herald, wrote, “A stake will be
driven through our souls” with the closure of the network and asked why the
national broadcaster ABC was not screening across Asia.
Richard
Broinowski, former Australian ambassador to Vietnam, South Korea and Cuba, and
former general manager of Radio Australia, echoed those sentiments and said
projecting an image of the country abroad was too serious a matter to be left
to commercial interests.
“I think
it’s a short-sighted and stupid decision. Australia needs all the profile it
can get in Asia, and this is a move in the opposite direction,” he said.
The
running of AN fell under Australia’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade
(DFAT) and despite popular beliefs to the contrary among expatriate Australians
the service was not designed for them. AN’s target audience was locals, in
their home country.
“The
satellite TV market is so crowded. There are 200 channels available. Every
country in Asia, including the poorest, have at least one or two 24-hour news
services, and everyone is struggling,” said Bruce Dover former AN Chief
Executive Officer and now a broadcasting consultant. “So what were we
providing?”
He agreed
with the sentiments of many viewers, angered by AN’s closure, but he added the
decision was complicated by costs and politics.
He said
the latest figures showed the service was drawing about 250,000 viewers a month
and the US$20 million a year it cost would be more effectively spent on online
digital programing that could also be produced in local languages.
“Every
international broadcaster is having its problems at the moment. The real play
in Asia is mobile digital,” he said. “The grand colonial view of a pan-world
service has died.”
Australian
Network will apparently be replaced Australia Plus, which will provide a six-hour
block of television programming. However, details remain sketchy. They say it
will be “available online and on-demand, on television and radio.”
Dover
said there was merit to the argument of transmitting the ABC 24-hour news
channel and charging perhaps US$5 or US$10 a month to view, but this too had
problems because it was not as simple as just transmitting the same signal that
is broadcast in Australia.
The bulk
of ABC programming is based on exclusive rights in Australia, which means the
ABC was not in a position to screen internationally, particularly programs
acquired from the BBC in Britain, PBS in the United States, or Al Jazeera in
Doha.
Nevertheless,
he said Australian expats numbered about one million, of whom 200,000 might be
expected to subscribe to a service that could fall under the ABC’s charter to
provide for Australians abroad.
Independence
would be key. AN programming was dictated by DFAT, which stipulated dedicated
hours for English learning, drama, kids programs, news and current affairs, as
well as the often derided Aussie soap operas.
“… and
that was part of the problem,” Dover said.
Hong
Kong-based Mike Hoare, Managing Director of The Blueprint Communications
Foundry, said AN had been widely criticized for showing too much football from
the Australian Football League (AFL) and ABC-produced programs.
“And
while there’s truth to that, the current affairs and news coverage was second
to none.”
“Some of
the coverage, depth of insight and commentary on Asian affairs was a match for
any serious news organization. So cutting Australia Network was disappointing
for many reasons but I think the Australian government has squandered a scarce
opportunity to be an important, and independent, media voice and play a role in
shaping the region.”
In Cambodia,
American and co-founder of The Phnom Penh Post Michael Hayes said his
compatriots abroad were avid viewers of AN and in particular Four
Corners, Landline, Barry
Cassidy and Insiders, Q&A
and Poh’s Kitchen.
“That TV
channel shows you can have crucial debate about issues that matter without
killing each other,” he said, before singing the theme song from the nightly
soap opera Neighbors.
Importantly,
AN was a rare avenue to push Australia’s view of the world, and this mattered
in times of trouble. In 2000 and in early 2001 speculation was rife that then
Prime Minister John Howard was prepared to cut the service due to budget
pressures.
But he
relented after al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden launched his attacks on New York
and Washington, in September, 2001.
Howard
was in the United States during those attacks and quickly realized the value –
and public relations advantages – of controlling a television network with an
international scope as the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq and the rise of
Jemaah Islamiyah in Southeast Asia unfolded.
Dover
added that Australian expats had made themselves heard before the service was
disconnected, and he said they got what they wanted.
“Their
driving message was the AFL, it’s the footy. They can get their news from The
Sydney Morning Herald or The Age online but they want to watch
Collingwood and Hawthorn play live.”
But
audiences are fickle and the content did not always sit well with Peter Miles,
a Hong Kong-based doctor from New South Wales. He said he was regular
television news watcher but even that changed as the network became dominated
by the AFL, Australia’s local football code.
“My lack
of a regular look at the Australian Network came when they said that the only
games that would be covered were from the AFL. No Rugby was covered at all.
Very parochial.”
Luke Hunt
No comments:
Post a Comment