We are told by government-funded climate alarmists
that their forecasts of dangerous man-made global warming rely on “settled
science”. Their “settled science” represents a mare’s nest of computer models,
resting on a few match-sticks of science, surrounded by tall forests of
uncertainty.
It is indeed settled science that all gases in the atmosphere can affect
the exchange of heat between the sun, the Earth and outer space, and this can
affect global temperatures. It is also agreed that certain gases like water
vapour and carbon dioxide can absorb and redirect radiant energy passing
through the atmosphere.
It is also settled science (but seldom mentioned) that the warming
potential of each additional unit of carbon dioxide is progressively less, and
is trivial at and above current levels. It is also agreed that water vapour has
a far greater “greenhouse effect”, because it is fifty times more abundant, and
it affects more radiation wavelengths.
However, it is not settled science that the amount of carbon dioxide in
the atmosphere is the main controller of global temperatures. Nor is it proven
or agreed that man’s production of carbon dioxide is harmful to life on Earth,
or that it will cause catastrophic global warming.
The official climate models are based on a theory that the amount of
carbon dioxide in the atmosphere drives surface temperature changes. However,
not one of the dozens of computerised climate models relied on by the IPCC predicted
flat-lining temperatures over the last 17 years. This indicates that their
carbon-centric assumption is wrong. At last count, there were 53 different
explanations for these failures. This is hardly “settled science”.
The models ignore important climate controllers such as solar cycles,
ocean oscillations, clouds, vegetation cover and volcanoes. These all have
significant effects on surface temperature.
The models also err in assuming most feedbacks are strongly positive,
thus multiplying the initial small effect. This again is NOT settled science.
If surface temperature rises, evaporation from the vast oceans will transfer
heat from the surface to the upper atmosphere, where much of the heat is
radiated to space and where the shading from the additional clouds tends to
offset and stabilise the initial surface heating. Carbon dioxide has naturally
exceeded today’s levels in the past but this did not cause runaway global
warming.
There is no consensus. Climate science is
NOT settled.
Official climate models have failed to reflect all the interconnected
variables of the solar system, the restless atmosphere, the changing biosphere
and the vast oscillating oceans. Pickering Post
No comments:
Post a Comment