If we
want to address the issue of security and stability in the South China Sea and
elsewhere, we are talking about common borders, common threats and common
challenges.
And when
we discuss all these problems, we all assume that everyone of us is governed by
international law, without which relationships between states and governments
cannot be carried out within a framework of rules, set and accepted by all.
These rules seek to shape our political behavior in terms of cooperation.
Without
establishing this set of principles, to which all of us bow, which is to say
that we all vow to enforce it, talking about maritime security and stability
would be talking about very vague and general policy issues, while this subject
is linked directly with the individual interests of each country.
In many
cases that divide countries, it is plain to see there is a practice of double
standards, usually by those that have more means to spend on propaganda, on
alienation and on the pursuit of interests that exceed their rights and breach
the interests of others. More often than not, demagogy covers the attempts
against the values to which we all are committed.
Only a
sound basis of respect for international law can rule cooperative relationships
between neighbors and within a regional context. Otherwise, there will always
be an environment of distrust causing frictions and leading to warnings and
responses to those warnings, which may lead to confrontations.
This
situation causes apprehension to those who have little or nothing to do with
the problems, since it may lead to possible political, social and economic
impacts that will always disturb states, particularly when they are having
difficulties in their development processes.
Today,
maritime security covers large- and small-scale activities.
We
understand that a trend in our region is to protect commercial maritime
interest, amid rising regional tensions and according to defense analysts,
maritime surveillance is the most pressing need in East and Southeast Asia.
In our
opinion, maritime cooperation would have a meaning of more deterrence, if we
want to put it like that.
East
Timor is an island country (better yet, a half-island country). As such, the
sea is of paramount importance when discussing the country’s security strategy.
East
Timor loses over $50 million a year in illegal fishing. My government is also
concerned with the security of it’s future petroleum exploration facilities in
the sea. As such, East Timor wants to strengthen it’s maritime component to put
an end to illegal fishing and to protect its interests and the investments it
has.
The
strengthening of the maritime police and the naval component, through providing
them with proper resources, will surely increase certainty and confidence in
regard to our country’s maritime security.
East
Timor, which has only been an independent state for the past 12 years, is
therefore prioritizing it’s needs, from the human capacity building to the
construction of the necessary facilities.
In
addition to this, it is obvious that having adequate means, in our exclusive
economic zones, will enable us to participate in fighting the trafficking of
arms and drugs as well as illegal trade.
East
Timor is currently in the process to joining the Association of Southeast Asian
Nations. As small as my country is, we do not harbor illusions of grandeur that
we will make enormous contributions to the region’s maritime security. However,
we recognize the need for active cooperation with all who are close to our
maritime borders.
Here, I
should say that we are talking with Indonesia in relation to the islands
closest to us, and with Australia in relation to the Northern Territory, in
order to draft an agreement on an integrated development plan.
Fortunately,
everything suggests that there is enormous goodwill from all parties, which are
motivated by the perspective of broader cooperation that results in concrete
benefits for the people.
Evidently,
maritime security will be very important in an area that we may call an
economic, social and cultural sub-region. However, in order for this
cooperation to be honest and serious, it is vital that we determine the
maritime borders between countries, under international law, in a clear manner
without subterfuges of any kind.
It is
truly offensive to see how some countries, because they are large, wealthy or
heavily armed, are always the ones that are more unfair to their neighbors,
particularly when those neighbors are small and poor.
International
law is always invoked, in the pronouncements made in relation to other
countries. But international law is simply relegated or forgotten, when it is
to ensure major economic benefits at the expense of the principle of fair
policy and of the universal values of equal rights and obligations between
people and nations.
As a new
country that is still consolidating state institutions and where most people
still lack the minimum conditions for living healthy lives, we can only raise
our voice to make sure that there must be true justice in the world,
particularly in this new millennium.
We only
became a full-fledged member of the United Nations in September 2002, while
many other countries signed the UN Charter in 1945, when the organization was
created and, from time to time, it happens that they are called for relevant
positions, including in the Security Council.
In a
way, we only can get confused and stunned thinking about how international law
may prevail when the ones who do not respect it, would be the ones making
decisions in these important world bodies. The intricate reasons of the Cold
War have now led to a sophisticated culture of manipulation and fraud, seeking
to alienate the unwary and the unprepared.
I have
to say, once for all, that we are and will always be committed to standing for
the truth, with the same spirit we had, in the past, when many believed that
East Timor was a lost cause. We will stand for our rights with the same faith
and determination, in order to contribute to justice between nations and better
understanding between people.
And we
believe that the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea should play an effective
role in solving the differences.
For a
country as small as mine, talking about maritime security, whether in terms of
joint exercises or information sharing, will never solve and may even
permanently hinder the vital issue of the delimitation of the maritime borders.
It is
fundamental to us, more so when neighbors buy drones to secure their ocean
resources and protect their borders.
We
firmly believe in the motto “times change, wills change.” I would like to quote
the former US secretary of state for defense, Robert Gates, who, in an honest
way of putting things in regard to a different matter, acknowledged “the lack
of humility to accept there was no forecast on the negative consequences,”
resulting from decisions made only to display arrogance and power.
Globalization
binds small countries and makes them hostage to their own weaknesses, when
competing in the global market. However, globalization also presents valuable
opportunities, when properly considered, for small countries to denounce the
lack of good faith by the large countries, the lack of honesty by the powerful
countries and the policy of manipulation by the rich countries.
Let the
effort in fighting transnational crimes not allow other interests, particularly
in terms of economic dominance, to cast a shade over the relationships between
countries and the cooperation that should exist between nations.
Xanana
Gusmao is the prime minister of East Timor. This article is based on his speech
at the Jakarta International Defense Dialogue on March 19.
No comments:
Post a Comment