West Papuan efforts to put
self-determination on the international stage gain momentum
One
voice … West Papua's demand for greater independence from Indonesia has not
gone unheard by other Melanesian states. Photograph: Shaun Curry/Getty
A diplomatic whirlwind around efforts by West Papuans to
gain international recognition for self-determination is gaining intensity
after an application by an umbrella organisation for political and tribal groups
in Indonesia's
eastern region, the West Papua National Coalition for Liberation,
to join the Pacific Islands region's power bloc, known as the Melanesian Spearhead Group (MSG).
The membership bid was widely anticipated before a recent
MSG leaders' summit in Noumea, the capital city of the French special
collectivity of New Caledonia. A decision on the matter by the group's five
members – Papua
New Guinea, Fiji,
Solomon
Islands, Vanuatu
and New Caledonia's indigenous Kanak and Socialist Liberation Front
– has been deferred while they look to engage more closely with Jakarta on the
issue of human rights abuses in heavily militarised Papua and West Papua provinces. For decades,
Indonesia has restricted access to the Papua region. But it is becoming
impossible to keep a lid on the catalogue of events there. Violence, torture
and extrajudicial killings are all part of the region's recent narrative.
The International Coalition for Papua of civil
society and faith-based organisations notes a high level of violence where the
perpetrators – said to be mainly Indonesian security forces – have widespread
impunity.
"We are aware of the atrocities and human rights
violations being committed against West Papuans in their homeland," said
Vanuatu's prime minister, Moana Carcasses, at the June summit. He warned
that history would judge the MSG members poorly if they failed to act
decisively on West Papua.
Carcasses's call to action was echoed by his Solomon Islands
counterpart, Gordon Darcy Lilo. "We can
provide a platform for dialogue between West Papua and Indonesia," said
Lilo, who advocates "an approach that considers consultations and dialogue
with both Indonesia and West Papuans [to] allow for responsible and managed
progress towards self-determination".
Such statements are a significant departure. Although the
MSG was created in the 1980s with the aim of breaking the colonial shackles for
all Melanesians, West Papua has until now been kept off the agenda, mainly at
Papua New Guinea's behest.
The plight of the Melanesians on the other side of the
porous 760km border that divides New Guinea has long been a sensitive issue for
Papua New Guinea. Over the years, it has struggled to contain the thousands of
West Papuans fleeing the Indonesian military, and has battled with the
cross-border movement of arms and contraband.
In Papua New Guinea, public anguish runs deep about the
treatment of neighbouring West Papuans. The International Coalition for Papua
reports that the indigenous people experience a much lower level of security
and protection of their right to life compared with other residents of
Indonesia's Papua.
While the West Papua National Coalition for Liberation was
busy lobbying support from Melanesian governments, Indonesian lobbying against
the membership bid has applied a full range of economic and diplomatic pressure
on Papua New Guinea in particular, says Richard Chauvel from the School of Social Sciences at
Melbourne's Victoria University.
"The PNG government clearly has an interest in
maintaining the security of that border," says Chauvel, "and PNG military
forces are dwarfed by the Indonesian security forces stationed in West
Papua."
By far the biggest member of the Melanesian group,
resource-rich Papua New Guinea wields a major influence. Last month it agreed
with Indonesia on a range of joint border projects such as gas exploration,
highway construction and hydropower. Papua New Guinea's prime minister, Peter O'Neill, missed this year's Melanesian
summit, opting instead for a state visit to Jakarta with a large business
delegation. This was seen by some as reaffirming its support for Indonesian
control of West Papua.
Fiji, too, has strengthened economic and military ties with
Indonesia, while turning away from traditional partners Australia and New
Zealand. The leader of Fiji's military regime, Commodore Frank Bainimarama, was instrumental in
securing an invitation for a Melanesian group's mission to Indonesia later this
year to discuss West Papua.
He is less keen on the WPNCL's application than his
counterparts in Vanuatu and Solomon Islands. MSG leaders say they will decide
on the membership bid pending the mission's outcome.
"Fiji wants to play on the bigger stage, engage with
major Asian powers," says Fijian academic Brij Lal, of the Australian National University's
School of Culture, History and Language. "But siding with Indonesia on the
West Papua issue muddies the situation and undermines the regional solidarity
required on issues of regional security and peace."
The WPNCL's secretary general, Rex Rumakiek, says what is
important is that their struggle has been internationalised. "They are now
visually recognising the issue and collectively want to do something about
it."
A specialist in Papua affairs, Chauvel says the MSG is
significant in the context of West Papua's long struggle. "Almost all
other groups within the broader pro-independence movement feel that the only
way to get the Indonesian government to talk to them is through international
pressure."
Indonesia recognises the importance of consolidating ties
with Melanesia. It controversially achieved observer status in the Melanesian
group two years ago under Fiji's chairmanship. As Indonesia's vice-minister for
foreign affairs, Wisnu Wardhana, told the summit, trade between MSG countries
and his country amounted to $320m in 2012 and is on the rise.
The mood in the Pacific region for decolonisation should not
be underestimated. The new chair of the MSG is the Kanak and Socialist
Liberation Front, which received reinvigorated support from the independent
Melanesian states for its own self-determination campaign. The timing is
important as the Noumea Accord enters its final
phase. The accord, which dates to 1998, provides for a potential transferral of
political power to New Caledonia subject to a referendum to be held between
2014 and 2019.
Other Pacific states are seeking consolidated support for
similar causes. Among the special guests at the Melanesian summit was French Polynesia's former
president, Oscar Temaru, who, in May, within hours of losing the election to
the pro-France veteran Gaston Flosse, succeeded in getting the territory
reinstated on the UN decolonisation list. This list provides
non-self-governing territories with UN oversight and help in a process towards
an act of self-determination.
Solomon Islands sponsored the UN resolution, playing a key
role in its success by galvanising support from the Melanesia network. This
brings the number of Pacific territories on the UN list to six, from a total
17.
There's still a long way to go. "Remnants of colonial
times are still trying to scare our peoples and convince us that we are not fit
to manage our own destinies together," said Temaru. "We have huge
resources and potential that are coveted by big sharks that roam our
oceans."
The Melanesian leaders say they must show resolve to
withstand pressure from big countries on issues of self-determination. On the
West Papua question particularly, the MSG must also manage its own internal
divisions. The push for freedom by the people of the Pacific is growing, but
the movement needs united support from Melanesia to stand a chance.
“The Guardian”
“The Guardian”
No comments:
Post a Comment