In the eyes of many, West Papua should be a
country independent from Indonesia
Background
While Papua New Guinea is a sovereign nation, few realize
that the western half of the world’s second largest island is Indonesian
territory. This resource-rich island is one of the least publicized places on
earth, a place where the fight between modernity and tradition is still being
waged — and with bloody consequences.
Although the island is recognized as Indonesian territory,
Papuan natives are ethnically and linguistically distinctive. Native Papuans
are recognized as Melanesian. Indonesians native to other islands, such as
Sumatra or Java, fall instead within the Austronesian ethno-linguistic family.
Despite thousands of years of regional commingling between Melanesians and
Austronesians, the majority of Papua remained essentially isolated from any
outside influence until the mid 20th century.
Papuan nationalism began to grow during World War II, with
Japan’s seizure of the island in 1942 prompting a clash involving over 80,000
allied troops. Despite nearly 300 different languages being spoken amongst West
Papuans alone, Papuan tribal society developed into a unified Papuan
nationalism under foreign occupations. This resulted in the majority native
Papuan “New Guinea Council,” which set forth the goal of Papuan independence in
1970. This was envisioned, at the time, as independence from the Dutch.
In 1945, Indonesia’s first president, Sukarno, declared
Indonesian independence from Dutch rule. In seeing that Papua was an extension
of the Dutch colony, Sukarno claimed Papua as part of the Indonesian nation. To
forgo military engagement, the Dutch signed the New York Agreement of 1962,
promising Papuans a fair referendum within six years to vote for either Papuan
sovereignty or Indonesian rule.
Papuan aversion to Indonesian rule was clear from the
beginning, and in 1965, it manifested itself in revolts known as the “West
Papuan Spring” These revolts were short-lived, as they were consistently met
with brutal retaliation from the Indonesian military. Nevertheless, the Free
Papua Movement was born.
Why is the Free Papua Movement
Relevant?
Aside from mass revolt, 1965 also saw Sukarno fall to
Suharto, who then viewed the protests and instability as justification to
allocate voting power in Papua’s referendum to a mere 1,025 men. Declared the
“Act of Free Choice,” military records account that Papuans favored Indonesian
citizenship. To this day, many Papuans instead call it the “Act of No
Choice” — around 1,000 were hand picked by the military to represent a
population of nearly 2 million.
Since the “Act of Free Choice,” the Free Papua Movement has
persistently engaged in actions ranging from violent guerrilla operations to
peaceful protest, civil disobedience, and flying the Morning Star — the flag
symbolizing a Papua free from foreign rule. Having dealt with its fair share of
separatist movements, the Indonesian government often labels the Free Papua
Movement’s actions as terrorist threats. Thus, action is generally met with
violent Indonesian military repercussions. There are, for example, documented
cases of individuals receiving ten-year jail sentences for attending a Morning
Star raising ceremony.
While Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the
United Nations have documented human rights violations in West Papua, the
Indonesian government’s legal limitations on travel and persistence that the region’s
dangers pose a threat to international journalists and NGOs have kept West
Papua’s freedom movement out of the international media spotlight.
The Free West Papua Campaign was launched in Oxford,
England, in 2004 and is led by exiled West Papuan independence leader, Benny
Wenda. It hopes to bring international attention to human rights violations in
Papua through peaceful campaigning. These human rights violations include
failures of the Indonesian government on the island to address issues such as poverty,
education, health, and development. The movement hopes to one day see the
Morning Star flying freely amidst the tree tops of the island. They envision a
fair, transparent, and fully representative referendum — one that they believe,
if acted upon, would lead to a free and independent Papua.
Many Indonesians see Papua as one of their national
strengths, as it legitimizes the national motto, “Unity in Diversity.” Many
West Papuans, however, feel they have waited too long for freedom.
beta
A news analysis platform providing a plurality of
perspectives from around the world. Join a global conversation. Your
perspective matters.
No comments:
Post a Comment