Over the last two decades, Chinese governments have approved
the construction of a cascade of large dams on the stretches of the Mekong
River that lie within its borders, prompting disquiet amongst downstream riparian
states.
Those states — Cambodia, Laos, Thailand and Vietnam — are
now set to wage their own battle for control of precious water resources, with
China looming large through its role as a willing creditor.
Despite hydropower plans for the Lower Mekong dating back to
the 1950s, the river still flows freely south of the Chinese border. That may
not be the case for much longer. The governments of Cambodia, Laos, Thailand
and Vietnam have proposed to build eleven
dams on the Lower Mekong — nine in Laos and two in Cambodia. Much of the
electricity generated would ultimately be consumed in Thailand and Vietnam
through contract agreements between the four states. The first of these
proposed dams is already under construction; and on 7 November 2012, Laos and
Thailand held a ground-breaking ceremony at the site of the Thai-funded
Xayaburi Dam, defying the Mekong River Commission’s call for a 10-year moratorium
on dam-building along the Lower Mekong.
Although China’s upstream activities on the Mekong have
generated distrust and disapproval further down the river, recipient
governments have still enthusiastically welcomed large Chinese investments in
Southeast Asia. Laos is a case in point. Of the nine proposed Laotian Mekong
mainstream dams, Chinese financiers and developers have interests in at least
four. China also has a stake in about half of the proposed 63 dams on Laotian
Mekong tributaries. Outside of hydropower, Laos’ ruling politburo is now
negotiating the terms of a US$7.2 billion Chinese loan to finance construction
of a long-awaited high-speed railway between
the two countries. That loan represents nearly 90 per cent of Laos’ US$8.3
billion GDP.
As a water engineer in Laos, China is acting in direct
accordance with its strategic interests. It is locking up electricity supply
deals and protecting regional geopolitical interests by securing crucial
developing Southeast Asian neighbours as long-term debtors through
high-interest loans. For the Laotian government, a potential future for their
country as the ‘battery of Asia’ could just be a pathway to greater economic
independence and long-awaited development.
However, Chinese dam building in Laos could also have
serious negative consequences. The potential environmental impacts of large
dams are well-documented — sediment build-up, landslides, destruction of
fisheries, even seismic shifts. The Lower Mekong Basin is currently the largest
inland fishery in the world. Laotians and Cambodians are particularly reliant
on fish caught from the river to meet their protein needs; construction of the
11 planned dams would lead to an estimated 26–42 per cent loss in
annual fish production. Even the apparent economic benefits of major
investments in dam infrastructure and other major projects could prove to be a
double-edged sword — inflation exacerbated by such large influxes of capital
could cause cost-of-living pressures for many Laotians.
How China distributes its largesse across Southeast Asia,
including in Laos, will significantly determine the degree to which it builds
crucial regional support in a multi-polar geopolitical order. Perceptions that
China uses aid and development assistance to win friends and buy political
leverage in its neighbourhood will likely enhance suspicion of its long-term
intentions. The region south of China’s border is already part of the ongoing
contest between the United States and China for support in the Asia Pacific.
The United States has launched its own Lower Mekong Initiative and in July 2011 Congress
adopted a resolution opposing the development of
the Xayaburi Dam, which could reflect an intention to limit Chinese influence
in Southeast Asia. Meanwhile, China has deployed armed police vessels
along rivers in Northern Laos and Myanmar to quell piracy.
As Chinese influence increases and smaller Southeast Asian
neighbours are increasingly attracted to the large loans China offers, the
already limited effectiveness of forums for cooperative management of
trans-boundary issues may become even more pronounced. The Mekong River
Commission’s call for a moratorium on dam building on the Lower Mekong has, for
example, been ignored by both Thailand and Laos. Whether Chinese economic and
military superiority will be sufficient to ensure ongoing peace in Southeast
Asia in the absence of such forums remains to be seen. The way in which large
Chinese-funded dam projects in Laos are received by Thailand, Cambodia and
Vietnam will be an important litmus test.
Huw Pohlner is Manager of Strategy at Asialink.
He will shortly commence graduate studies on the governance of water in China
as a General
Sir John Monash Scholar at Oxford University.
No comments:
Post a Comment