The existence of civil society and its vibrant
activism have been shown to contribute to a nation’s development and
democratisation
Is there a civil society in Vietnam? Is Vietnam democratising? These
questions need to be addressed amidst scepticism of — or even a rejection of
the existence of — both a functioning civil society and democratisation in
these countries.
Civil society is broadly defined as a network of non-state
actors that differ from organisations such as self-governed sport clubs,
research institutes and think tanks. The non-state actors in this context are
commonly referred to as social organisations or associations. The key tenet of
civil society is that it is independent of the state by all means — it is not
subjected to state control and influence in any way or form. Only when this
tenet is strictly upheld can civil society scrutinise public policies
effectively without state restrictions.
The state control of, and restriction on, social
organisations in Vietnam make many believe that there is no civil society. In
Vietnam, it is very complicated. Social organisations in Vietnam can be split
into two categories: governmental and pseudo non-governmental organisations
(NGOs).
The former includes those that are either financially
sponsored and guided, or not financially sponsored but guided by the Communist
Party of Vietnam. There are six governmental organisations that operate closely
with the Communist Party: the Fatherland Front, the Farmers Union, the Women’s
Union, the General Confederation of Labour, the Ho Chi Minh Communist Youth
Union and the Veterans Association. There are also two other national unions:
the Vietnam Union of Literature and Arts Associations and the Vietnam Union of
Science and Technology Associations (VUSTA), whose membership is in the
thousands nationwide. Also within this category are professional associations
such as the Vietnam Journalists Association and economic federations like the
Vietnam Economic Association.
The second category, pseudo NGOs, is represented by
organisations that must register with the government under the auspice of
VUSTA. These organisations proclaim themselves as NGOs, operating on their own
initiatives and funds without state intervention and influence.
However, activities of these NGOs are under strict
surveillance of government watchdogs. Thus, they are very careful about their
criticisms, if any, against the government. A legislative project to develop a
law allowing social organisations to exist free from government control in
Vietnam is currently on the backburner, as the government fears that the law
might put it in a political dilemma if it does not allow independent
organisations to operate.
In recent years, with the support of social media networks
like Twitter, Facebook and blogs, citizens in Vietnam are more updated and
engaged in public affairs, and are more likely to challenge the legitimacy of the
government and, above all, the communist party’s monopoly rule.
Netizen (internet citizen) communities are increasingly engaging in activities
such as calling for demonstrations or exposing corruption cases, making many
believe that a civil society already exists and democratisation is coming in
the two countries.
However, liberal democracy theorists would not be so
optimistic. Some conditions are necessary, though may not be enough, for both
civil society to operate and democratisation to occur, like freedom of
association, freedom of speech and independent press. Unfortunately, most
western civil society and democratisation theorists would agree that these
conditions are still absent in Vietnam. In fact, the existence of social
organisations networks and the activism of netizen communities should be
considered as social capital, which really matters for democratization only
when the above necessary conditions become available.
One cannot be too optimistic about the existence of civil
society and ongoing democratisation in Vietnam. But there is no doubt a solid
foundation for change. It is now just a matter of time.
Hai Hong Nguyen is a PhD candidate at the School of
Political Science and International Studies, the University of Queensland.
No comments:
Post a Comment